Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details TU-1.1 by Geographic Location for 2018

Disparities Details by Geographic Location for 2018
TU-1.1 : Adult cigarette smoking (age adjusted, percent, 18+ years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 20.6 (2008)
2020 Target: 12.0
Desired Direction: ↓ Decrease Desired
Data Source: National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Geographic Location for TU-1.1

TU-1.1 Reduce cigarette smoking by adults

Adult cigarette smoking (age adjusted, percent, 18+ years)

2020 Baseline (year): 20.6 (2008)
2020 Target: 12.0
Desired Direction: ↓ Decrease Desired
Geographic Location 2018 Disparity
Metropolitan 13.0
CI 12.4/13.7
SE 0.328
÷ 1.000
Best rate
Non-metropolitan 20.4
CI 18.6/22.2
SE 0.925
÷ 1.567
CI
1.000/ 1.707

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Geographic Location — 2018
  • The better group rate for this objective, 13.0% (age adjusted), was attained by persons living in a metropolitan area.
  • The worse group rate for this objective, 20.4% (age adjusted), was attained by persons living in a non-metropolitan area.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 7.4 percentage points.
  • The worst group rate was 1.567 times the best group rate.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Geographic Location — 2018

Persons living in a metropolitan area achieved the better group rate for this objective, 13.0% (age adjusted).

The rate among persons living in a non-metropolitan area was 1.567 times the better group rate.

FootnotesShow Footnotes