Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details STD-5 by Geographic Location for 2006-10

Disparities Details by Geographic Location for 2006-10
STD-5 : Females ever treated for pelvic inflammatory disease (percent, 15–44 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 4.2 (2006–10)
2020 Target: 3.8 1
Desired Direction: ↓ Decrease Desired
Data Source: National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Geographic Location for STD-5

STD-5 Reduce the proportion of females aged 15 to 44 years who have ever required treatment for pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)

Females ever treated for pelvic inflammatory disease (percent, 15–44 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 4.2 (2006–10)
2020 Target: 3.8 1
Desired Direction: ↓ Decrease Desired
Geographic Location 2006-10 2 Disparity
Non-metropolitan 4.2
CI 0.0/0.0
SE 0.363
÷ 1.000
Best rate
Metropolitan 4.4
CI 0.0/0.0
SE 0.396
÷ 1.065
CI
1.000/ 1.309

2 Baseline has been revised. See Data Details for more information.

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Geographic Location — 2006-10
  • The better group rate for this objective, 4.2%, was attained by persons living in a non-metropolitan area.
  • The worse group rate for this objective, 4.4%, was attained by persons living in a metropolitan area.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 0.3 percentage points.
  • The worst group rate was <1.100 times the best group rate.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Geographic Location — 2006-10

Persons living in a non-metropolitan area achieved the better group rate for this objective, 4.2%.

The rate among persons living in a metropolitan area was <1.1 times the better group rate.

FootnotesShow Footnotes