Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details SA-4.3 by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for 2017

Disparities Details by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for 2017
SA-4.3 : Adolescents perceiving great risk in using cocaine once a month (percent, 12–17)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 56.7 (2015)
2020 Target: 62.4 1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), SAMHSA
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for SA-4.3

SA-4.3 Increase the proportion of adolescents aged 12 to 17 years perceiving great risk associated with substance abuse—Using cocaine once per month

Adolescents perceiving great risk in using cocaine once a month (percent, 12–17)

2020 Baseline (year): 56.7 (2015)
2020 Target: 62.4 1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Family Income (percent poverty threshold) 2017 Disparity
<100 58.1
CI 55.9/60.3
SE 1.126
x 1.000
Best rate
100-199 56.4
CI 54.3/58.5
SE 1.075
x 1.029
CI
1.000/ 1.076
200-399 55.5
CI 53.6/57.4
SE 0.979
x 1.046
CI
1.000/ 1.092
400-599 53.6
CI 51.1/56.0
SE 1.262
x 1.084
CI
1.000/ 1.140
600+ 53.5
CI 51.1/55.9
SE 1.224
x 1.086
CI
1.000/ 1.141
Average group rate excluding best group rate 54.7
...
SE 1.317
x 1.061
CI 1.000/ 1.116

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) — 2017
  • The best group rate for this objective, 58.1%, was attained by persons whose family incomes were <100% of the poverty threshold.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 53.5%, was attained by persons whose family incomes were 600+% of the poverty threshold.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 4.6 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the average rate for all other family income groups (excluding the best), 54.7%.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) — 2017

Persons whose family incomes were <100% of the poverty threshold achieved the best group rate for this objective, 58.1%.

The best group rate was:

  • <1.1 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 100-199% of the poverty threshold.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 200-399% of the poverty threshold.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 400-599% of the poverty threshold.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 600+% of the poverty threshold.
FootnotesShow Footnotes