Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details PA-8.3.2 by Family Type for 2007

Disparities Details by Family Type for 2007
PA-8.3.2 : Children and adolescents using a computer for nonschool work for ≤2 hours a day (percent, 6–14 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 93.3 (2007)
2020 Target: 100
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
2007
Data Source: National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH), HRSA/MCHB and CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Family Type for PA-8.3.2

PA-8.3.2 Increase the proportion of children and adolescents aged 6 to 14 years who use a computer or play computer games outside of school (for nonschool work) for no more than 2 hours a day

Children and adolescents using a computer for nonschool work for ≤2 hours a day (percent, 6–14 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 93.3 (2007)
2020 Target: 100
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Spotlight on Disparities:
Family Type 2007 Disparity
Two parent, biological or adopted 94.1
CI 93.5/94.8
SE 0.348
x 1.000
Best rate
Other (with children) 92.1
CI 89.2/95.1
SE 1.504
x 1.022
CI
1.000/ 1.050
Single mother, no father present 91.7
CI 90.3/93.1
SE 0.698
x 1.027
CI
1.000/ 1.041
Two parent, step 91.3
CI 88.8/93.8
SE 1.279
x 1.031
CI
1.000/ 1.056
Average group rate excluding best group rate 91.7
...
SE 1.480
x 1.027
CI 1.000/ 1.055

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Family Type — 2007
  • The best group rate for this objective, 94.1%, was attained by persons who identify their family type as two parent, biological or adopted.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 91.3%, was attained by persons who identify their family type as two parent, step.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 2.9 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the average rate for all other family type groups (excluding the best), 91.7%.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Family Type — 2007

Persons who identify their family type as two parent, biological or adopted achieved the best group rate for this objective, 94.1%.

The best group rate was:

  • <1.1 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as other (with children).
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as single mother, no father present.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as two parent, step.
FootnotesShow Footnotes