Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details PA-8.1 by Family Type for 2007

Disparities Details by Family Type for 2007
PA-8.1 : Children viewing no television, videos, or video games on weekdays (percent, 0–2 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 40.6 (2007)
2020 Target: 44.7
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
2007
Data Source: National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH), HRSA/MCHB and CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Family Type for PA-8.1

PA-8.1 Increase the proportion of children aged 0 to 2 years who view no television or videos on an average weekday

Children viewing no television, videos, or video games on weekdays (percent, 0–2 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 40.6 (2007)
2020 Target: 44.7
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Spotlight on Disparities:
Family Type 2007 Disparity
Two parent, biological or adopted 42.5
CI 39.7/45.4
SE 1.471
x 1.000
Best rate
Other (with children) 42.5
CI 29.0/56.0
SE 6.886
x 1.001
CI
1.000/ 1.314
Single mother, no father present 30.8
CI 25.6/36.0
SE 2.653
x 1.380
CI
1.000/ 1.608
Average group rate excluding best group rate 36.7
...
SE 7.379
x 1.160
CI 1.000/ 1.624

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Family Type — 2007
  • The best group rate for this objective, 42.5%, was attained by persons who identify their family type as two parent, biological or adopted.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 30.8%, was attained by persons who identify their family type as single mother, no father present.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 11.7 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was 1.380 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was 1.160 times the average rate for all other family type groups (excluding the best), 36.7%.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Family Type — 2007

Persons who identify their family type as two parent, biological or adopted achieved the best group rate for this objective, 42.5%.

The best group rate was:

  • <1.1 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as other (with children).
  • 1.380 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as single mother, no father present.
FootnotesShow Footnotes