Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details PA-8.1 by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for 2007

Disparities Details by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for 2007
PA-8.1 : Children viewing no television, videos, or video games on weekdays (percent, 0–2 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 40.6 (2007)
2020 Target: 44.7
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
2007
Data Source: National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH), HRSA/MCHB and CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for PA-8.1

PA-8.1 Increase the proportion of children aged 0 to 2 years who view no television or videos on an average weekday

Children viewing no television, videos, or video games on weekdays (percent, 0–2 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 40.6 (2007)
2020 Target: 44.7
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Spotlight on Disparities:
Family Income (percent poverty threshold) 2007 Disparity
100-199 44.8
CI 38.7/50.9
SE 3.105
x 1.000
Best rate
200-399 43.9
CI 39.6/48.2
SE 2.195
x 1.021
CI
1.000/ 1.175
400+ 40.9
CI 37.1/44.7
SE 1.937
x 1.097
CI
1.000/ 1.259
<100 32.2
CI 26.3/38.2
SE 3.021
x 1.390
CI
1.000/ 1.684
Average group rate excluding best group rate 39.0
...
SE 2.975
x 1.149
CI 1.000/ 1.361

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) — 2007
  • The best group rate for this objective, 44.8%, was attained by persons whose family incomes were 100-199% of the poverty threshold.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 32.2%, was attained by persons whose family incomes were <100% of the poverty threshold.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 12.6 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was 1.390 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was 1.149 times the average rate for all other family income groups (excluding the best), 39.0%.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) — 2007

Persons whose family incomes were 100-199% of the poverty threshold achieved the best group rate for this objective, 44.8%.

The best group rate was:

  • <1.1 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 200-399% of the poverty threshold.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 400+% of the poverty threshold.
  • 1.390 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were <100% of the poverty threshold.
FootnotesShow Footnotes