Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details PA-2.2 by Family Type for 2016

Disparities Details by Family Type for 2016
PA-2.2 : Adults engaging in regular physical activity—Light or moderate for 300+ minutes/week or vigorous for 150+ minutes/week (age adjusted, percent, 18+ years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 28.4 (2008)
2020 Target: 31.3
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Family Type for PA-2.2

PA-2.2 Increase the proportion of adults who engage in aerobic physical activity of at least moderate intensity for more than 300 minutes/week, or more than 150 minutes/week of vigorous intensity, or an equivalent combination

Adults engaging in regular physical activity—Light or moderate for 300+ minutes/week or vigorous for 150+ minutes/week (age adjusted, percent, 18+ years)

2020 Baseline (year): 28.4 (2008)
2020 Target: 31.3
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Family Type 2016 Disparity
Two parent family with children 40.7
CI 35.3/46.0
SE 2.734
x 1.000
Best rate
Married couple or partners 39.1
CI 37.3/41.0
SE 0.948
x 1.039
CI
1.000/ 1.169
Single 39.1
CI 37.7/40.4
SE 0.670
x 1.041
CI
1.000/ 1.167
Other 31.7
CI 30.2/33.3
SE 0.796
x 1.283
CI
1.000/ 1.443
Single parent with children 26.7
CI 24.0/29.5
SE 1.402
x 1.521
CI
1.000/ 1.750
Average group rate excluding best group rate 34.2
...
SE 1.147
x 1.191
CI 1.000/ 1.347

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Family Type — 2016
  • The best group rate for this objective, 40.7% (age adjusted), was attained by persons who identify their family type as two parent family with children.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 26.7% (age adjusted), was attained by persons who identify their family type as single parent with children.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 13.9 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was 1.521 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was 1.191 times the average rate for all other family type groups (excluding the best), 34.2% (age adjusted).
Detailed measures of health disparities by Family Type — 2016

Persons who identify their family type as two parent family with children achieved the best group rate for this objective, 40.7% (age adjusted).

The best group rate was:

  • <1.1 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as married couple or partners.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as single.
  • 1.283 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as other.
  • 1.521 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as single parent with children.
FootnotesShow Footnotes