Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details OH-12.2 by Family Income (percent poverty guidelines) for 2009-10

Disparities Details by Family Income (percent poverty guidelines) for 2009-10
OH-12.2 : Children receiving dental sealants on permanent first molar teeth (percent, 6–9 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 25.5 (1999-2004)
2020 Target: 28.1 1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Family Income (percent poverty guidelines) for OH-12.2

OH-12.2 Increase the proportion of children aged 6 to 9 years who have received dental sealants on one or more of their permanent first molar teeth

Children receiving dental sealants on permanent first molar teeth (percent, 6–9 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 25.5 (1999-2004)
2020 Target: 28.1 1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Family Income (percent poverty guidelines) 2009-10 Disparity
200-399 38.4
CI 28.6/49.3
SE 4.937
x 1.000
Best rate
400-499 38.3
CI 24.2/54.7
SE 7.404
x 1.004
CI
1.000/ 1.470
500+ 35.9
CI 27.7/44.9
SE 4.090
x 1.071
CI
1.000/ 1.421
<100 26.9
CI 21.3/33.5
SE 2.901
x 1.427
CI
1.000/ 1.879
100-199 26.5
CI 20.9/32.9
SE 2.851
x 1.453
CI
1.000/ 1.914
Average group rate excluding best group rate 31.9
...
SE 5.419
x 1.205
CI 1.000/ 1.711

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Family Income (percent poverty guidelines) — 2009-10
  • The best group rate for this objective, 38.4%, was attained by persons whose family incomes were 200-399% of the poverty guidelines.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 26.5%, was attained by persons whose family incomes were 100-199% of the poverty guidelines.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 12.0 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was 1.453 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was 1.205 times the average rate for all other family income groups (excluding the best), 31.9%.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Family Income (percent poverty guidelines) — 2009-10

Persons whose family incomes were 200-399% of the poverty guidelines achieved the best group rate for this objective, 38.4%.

The best group rate was:

  • <1.1 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 400-499% of the poverty guidelines.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 500+% of the poverty guidelines.
  • 1.427 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were <100% of the poverty guidelines.
  • 1.453 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 100-199% of the poverty guidelines.
FootnotesShow Footnotes