Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details NWS-17.1 by Age Group for 2009-12

Disparities Details by Age Group for 2009-12
NWS-17.1 : Mean percent of total daily calorie intake from solid fats (age adjusted, 2+ years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 16.6 (2005–08)
2020 Target: 14.2 1, 2
Desired Direction: ↓ Decrease Desired
Data Source: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Age Group for NWS-17.1

NWS-17.1 Reduce consumption of calories from solid fats

Mean percent of total daily calorie intake from solid fats (age adjusted, 2+ years)

2020 Baseline (year): 16.6 (2005–08)
2020 Target: 14.2 1, 2
Desired Direction: ↓ Decrease Desired
Age Group 2009-12 Disparity
19 years and over 14.8
CI 14.5/15.2
SE 0.160
÷ 1.000
Best rate
2-18 years 16.4
CI 16.1/16.7
SE 0.152
÷ 1.106
CI
1.000/ 1.132

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Age Group — 2009-12
  • The better group rate for this objective, 14.8%, was attained by persons aged 19 years and over.
  • The worse group rate for this objective, 16.4%, was attained by children and adolescents aged 2-18 years.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 1.6 percent.
  • The worst group rate was 1.106 times the best group rate.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Age Group — 2009-12

Persons aged 19 years and over achieved the better group rate for this objective, 14.8%.

The rate among children and adolescents aged 2-18 years was 1.106 times the better group rate.

FootnotesShow Footnotes