Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details MICH-9.4 by Geographic Location for 2013

Disparities Details by Geographic Location for 2013
MICH-9.4 : Very preterm live births (percent, <32 weeks gestation)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 1.7 (2007)
2020 Target: 1.5 1, 3
Desired Direction: ↓ Decrease Desired
Data Source: National Vital Statistics System-Natality (NVSS-N), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Geographic Location for MICH-9.4

MICH-9.4 Reduce very preterm or live births at less than 32 weeks of gestation

Very preterm live births (percent, <32 weeks gestation)

2020 Baseline (year): 1.7 (2007)
2020 Target: 1.5 1, 3
Desired Direction: ↓ Decrease Desired
Geographic Location 2013 Disparity
Non-metropolitan 1.6
CI 1.6/1.6
SE 0.017
÷ 1.000
Best rate
Metropolitan 1.6
CI 1.6/1.6
SE 0.007
÷ 1.028
CI
1.000/ 1.047

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Geographic Location — 2013
  • The better group rate for this objective, 1.6%, was attained by persons living in a non-metropolitan area.
  • The worse group rate for this objective, 1.6%, was attained by persons living in a metropolitan area.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 0.0 percentage points.
  • The worst group rate was <1.100 times the best group rate.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Geographic Location — 2013

Persons living in a non-metropolitan area achieved the better group rate for this objective, 1.6%.

The rate among persons living in a metropolitan area was <1.1 times the better group rate.

FootnotesShow Footnotes