Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details MICH-9.2 by Geographic Location for 2016

Disparities Details by Geographic Location for 2016
MICH-9.2 : Late preterm live births (percent, 34–36 weeks gestation)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 7.5 (2007)
2020 Target: 6.8 1, 3
Desired Direction: ↓ Decrease Desired
Data Source: National Vital Statistics System-Natality (NVSS-N), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Geographic Location for MICH-9.2

MICH-9.2 Reduce late preterm or live births at 34 to 36 weeks of gestation

Late preterm live births (percent, 34–36 weeks gestation)

2020 Baseline (year): 7.5 (2007)
2020 Target: 6.8 1, 3
Desired Direction: ↓ Decrease Desired
Geographic Location 2016 Disparity
Metropolitan 7.0
CI 7.0/7.1
SE 0.014
÷ 1.000
Best rate
Non-metropolitan 7.4
CI 7.3/7.4
SE 0.036
÷ 1.047
CI
1.000/ 1.056

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Geographic Location — 2016
  • The better group rate for this objective, 7.0%, was attained by persons living in a metropolitan area.
  • The worse group rate for this objective, 7.4%, was attained by persons living in a non-metropolitan area.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 0.3 percentage points.
  • The worst group rate was <1.100 times the best group rate.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Geographic Location — 2016

Persons living in a metropolitan area achieved the better group rate for this objective, 7.0%.

The rate among persons living in a non-metropolitan area was <1.1 times the better group rate.

FootnotesShow Footnotes