Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details MICH-7.1 by Geographic Location for 2010

Disparities Details by Geographic Location for 2010
MICH-7.1 : Cesarean births among low-risk women with no prior births (percent)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 27.4 (2007)
2020 Target: 24.7 1
Desired Direction: ↓ Decrease Desired
Data Source: National Vital Statistics System-Natality (NVSS-N), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Geographic Location for MICH-7.1

MICH-7.1 Reduce cesarean births among low-risk women with no prior births

Cesarean births among low-risk women with no prior births (percent)

2020 Baseline (year): 27.4 (2007)
2020 Target: 24.7 1
Desired Direction: ↓ Decrease Desired
Geographic Location 2010 Disparity
Non-metropolitan 26.6
CI 26.4/26.8
SE 0.099
÷ 1.000
Best rate
Metropolitan 27.7
CI 27.6/27.8
SE 0.042
÷ 1.039
CI
1.000/ 1.046

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Geographic Location — 2010
  • The better group rate for this objective, 26.6%, was attained by persons living in a non-metropolitan area.
  • The worse group rate for this objective, 27.7%, was attained by persons living in a metropolitan area.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 1.0 percentage points.
  • The worst group rate was <1.100 times the best group rate.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Geographic Location — 2010

Persons living in a non-metropolitan area achieved the better group rate for this objective, 26.6%.

The rate among persons living in a metropolitan area was <1.1 times the better group rate.

FootnotesShow Footnotes