Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details MICH-31.2 by Health Insurance Status for 2009-10

Disparities Details by Health Insurance Status for 2009-10
MICH-31.2 : Children with special health care needs receiving care in family-centered, coordinated systems (percent, 12–17 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 13.8 (2005–06)
2020 Target: 15.1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs (NS-CSHCN), HRSA/MCHB and CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Health Insurance Status for MICH-31.2

MICH-31.2 Increase the proportion of children aged 12 to 17 years with special health care needs who receive their care in family-centered, comprehensive, coordinated systems

Children with special health care needs receiving care in family-centered, coordinated systems (percent, 12–17 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 13.8 (2005–06)
2020 Target: 15.1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Spotlight on Disparities:
Health Insurance Status 2009-10 Disparity
Private 19.2
CI 17.9/20.5
SE 0.672
x 1.000
Best rate
Public 6.1
CI 5.0/7.5
SE 0.642
x 3.119
CI
1.000/ 3.738

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Health Insurance Status — 2009-10
  • The better group rate for this objective, 19.2%, was attained by persons with private insurance.
  • The worse group rate for this objective, 6.1%, was attained by persons with public insurance.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 13.0 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was 3.119 times the worst group rate.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Health Insurance Status — 2009-10

Persons with private insurance achieved the better group rate for this objective, 19.2%.

The better group rate was 3.119 times the rate among persons with public insurance.

FootnotesShow Footnotes