Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details MICH-31.1 by Health Insurance Status for 2009-10

Disparities Details by Health Insurance Status for 2009-10
MICH-31.1 : Children with special health care needs receiving care in family-centered, coordinated systems (percent, 0–11 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 20.4 (2005–06)
2020 Target: 22.4
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs (NS-CSHCN), HRSA/MCHB and CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Health Insurance Status for MICH-31.1

MICH-31.1 Increase the proportion of children aged 0 to 11 years with special health care needs who receive their care in family-centered, comprehensive, and coordinated systems

Children with special health care needs receiving care in family-centered, coordinated systems (percent, 0–11 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 20.4 (2005–06)
2020 Target: 22.4
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Spotlight on Disparities:
Health Insurance Status 2009-10 Disparity
Private 25.3
CI 23.9/26.6
SE 0.678
x 1.000
Best rate
Public 16.1
CI 14.7/17.7
SE 0.755
x 1.566
CI
1.000/ 1.711
Uninsured 0.0
CI 0.0/0.0
SE 0

1.000
Average group rate excluding best group rate 8.1
...
SE 0.755
x 3.132
CI 1.000/ 3.676

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Health Insurance Status — 2009-10
  • The best group rate for this objective, 25.3%, was attained by persons with private insurance.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 0.0%, was attained by uninsured persons.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 25.3 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was 3.132 times the average rate for all other health insurance status groups (excluding the best), 8.1%.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Health Insurance Status — 2009-10

Persons with private insurance achieved the best group rate for this objective, 25.3%.

The best group rate was:

  • 1.566 times the rate among persons with public insurance.
FootnotesShow Footnotes