Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details MICH-11.4 by Geographic Location for 2015-16

Disparities Details by Geographic Location for 2015-16
MICH-11.4 : Pregnant women abstaining from illicit drug use in the past 30 days (percent, 15–44 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 94.5 (2015–16)
2020 Target: 100
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), SAMHSA
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Geographic Location for MICH-11.4

MICH-11.4 Increase abstinence from illicit drugs among pregnant women

Pregnant women abstaining from illicit drug use in the past 30 days (percent, 15–44 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 94.5 (2015–16)
2020 Target: 100
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Geographic Location 2015-16 1 Disparity
Non-metropolitan 95.5
CI 92.3/97.4
SE 1.254
x 1.000
Best rate
Metropolitan 94.3
CI 92.5/95.7
SE 0.789
x 1.013
CI
1.000/ 1.039

1 Baseline has been revised. See Data Details for more information.

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Geographic Location — 2015-16
  • The better group rate for this objective, 95.5%, was attained by persons living in a non-metropolitan area.
  • The worse group rate for this objective, 94.3%, was attained by persons living in a metropolitan area.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 1.2 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the worst group rate.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Geographic Location — 2015-16

Persons living in a non-metropolitan area achieved the better group rate for this objective, 95.5%.

The better group rate was <1.1 times the rate among persons living in a metropolitan area.

FootnotesShow Footnotes