Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details MICH-11.2 by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for 2016-17

Disparities Details by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for 2016-17
MICH-11.2 : Pregnant women abstaining from binge drinking in past 30 days (percent, 15–44 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 95.5 (2015–16)
2020 Target: 100
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), SAMHSA
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for MICH-11.2

MICH-11.2 Increase abstinence from binge drinking among pregnant women

Pregnant women abstaining from binge drinking in past 30 days (percent, 15–44 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 95.5 (2015–16)
2020 Target: 100
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Family Income (percent poverty threshold) 2016-17 Disparity
100-199 98.0
CI 95.8/99.1
SE 0.774
x 1.000
Best rate
200-399 96.6
CI 94.6/97.9
SE 0.814
x 1.014
CI
1.000/ 1.034
600+ 95.4
CI 87.6/98.4
SE 2.406
x 1.028
CI
1.000/ 1.073
<100 94.3
CI 90.7/96.6
SE 1.457
x 1.039
CI
1.000/ 1.069
400-599 88.2
CI 80.7/93.0
SE 3.079
x 1.111
CI
1.000/ 1.179
Average group rate excluding best group rate 93.6
...
SE 2.453
x 1.047
CI 1.000/ 1.095

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) — 2016-17
  • The best group rate for this objective, 98.0%, was attained by persons whose family incomes were 100-199% of the poverty threshold.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 88.2%, was attained by persons whose family incomes were 400-599% of the poverty threshold.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 9.8 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was 1.111 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the average rate for all other family income groups (excluding the best), 93.6%.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) — 2016-17

Persons whose family incomes were 100-199% of the poverty threshold achieved the best group rate for this objective, 98.0%.

The best group rate was:

  • <1.1 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 200-399% of the poverty threshold.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 600+% of the poverty threshold.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were <100% of the poverty threshold.
  • 1.111 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 400-599% of the poverty threshold.
FootnotesShow Footnotes