Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details MICH-11.2 by Health Insurance Status for 2017-18

Disparities Details by Health Insurance Status for 2017-18
MICH-11.2 : Pregnant women abstaining from binge drinking in past 30 days (percent, 15–44 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 95.5 (2015–16)
2020 Target: 100
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), SAMHSA
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Health Insurance Status for MICH-11.2

MICH-11.2 Increase abstinence from binge drinking among pregnant women

Pregnant women abstaining from binge drinking in past 30 days (percent, 15–44 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 95.5 (2015–16)
2020 Target: 100
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Spotlight on Disparities:
Health Insurance Status 2017-18 Disparity
Public 96.3
CI 94.2/97.6
SE 0.840
x 1.000
Best rate
Private 95.4
CI 92.9/97.0
SE 1.014
x 1.009
CI
1.000/ 1.032

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Health Insurance Status — 2017-18
  • The better group rate for this objective, 96.3%, was attained by persons with public insurance.
  • The worse group rate for this objective, 95.4%, was attained by persons with private insurance.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 0.9 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the worst group rate.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Health Insurance Status — 2017-18

Persons with public insurance achieved the better group rate for this objective, 96.3%.

The better group rate was <1.1 times the rate among persons with private insurance.

FootnotesShow Footnotes