Disparities Details by Health Insurance Status for 2015-16
MICH-11.2 : Pregnant women abstaining from binge drinking in past 30 days (percent, 15–44 years)
This chart compares rates by population.
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Health Insurance Status for MICH-11.2
MICH-11.2 Increase abstinence from binge drinking among pregnant women
Pregnant women abstaining from binge drinking in past 30 days (percent, 15–44 years)
|Health Insurance Status||2015-16 1||Disparity|
|Average group rate excluding best group rate||
CI 1.000/ 1.027
1 Baseline has been revised. See Data Details for more information.
Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.
Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.
Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.
CI: 95% confidence interval.
- The best group rate for this objective, 95.6%, was attained by persons with private insurance.
- The worst group rate for this objective, 95.3%, was attained by persons with public insurance.
- The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 0.3 percentage points.
- The best group rate was <1.100 times the worst group rate.
- The best group rate was <1.100 times the average rate for all other health insurance status groups (excluding the best), 95.4%.
Persons with private insurance achieved the best group rate for this objective, 95.6%.
The best group rate was:
- <1.1 times the rate among insured persons.
- <1.1 times the rate among persons with public insurance.