Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details MICH-11.1 by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for 2016-17

Disparities Details by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for 2016-17
MICH-11.1 : Pregnant women abstaining from alcohol in past 30 days (percent, 15–44 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 89.4 (2007–08)
2020 Target: 98.3 1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), SAMHSA
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for MICH-11.1

MICH-11.1 Increase abstinence from alcohol among pregnant women

Pregnant women abstaining from alcohol in past 30 days (percent, 15–44 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 89.4 (2007–08)
2020 Target: 98.3 1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Family Income (percent poverty threshold) 2016-17 Disparity
<100 92.3
CI 88.6/95.0
SE 1.601
x 1.000
Best rate
200-399 92.0
CI 88.8/94.4
SE 1.387
x 1.004
CI
1.000/ 1.042
100-199 91.8
CI 87.0/94.9
SE 1.965
x 1.006
CI
1.000/ 1.053
600+ 89.6
CI 82.5/94.1
SE 2.886
x 1.030
CI
1.000/ 1.094
400-599 79.2
CI 71.0/85.6
SE 3.702
x 1.166
CI
1.000/ 1.265
Average group rate excluding best group rate 88.2
...
SE 3.045
x 1.047
CI 1.000/ 1.116

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) — 2016-17
  • The best group rate for this objective, 92.3%, was attained by persons whose family incomes were <100% of the poverty threshold.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 79.2%, was attained by persons whose family incomes were 400-599% of the poverty threshold.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 13.1 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was 1.166 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the average rate for all other family income groups (excluding the best), 88.2%.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) — 2016-17

Persons whose family incomes were <100% of the poverty threshold achieved the best group rate for this objective, 92.3%.

The best group rate was:

  • <1.1 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 200-399% of the poverty threshold.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 100-199% of the poverty threshold.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 600+% of the poverty threshold.
  • 1.166 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 400-599% of the poverty threshold.
FootnotesShow Footnotes