Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details MICH-11.1 by Health Insurance Status for 2017-18

Disparities Details by Health Insurance Status for 2017-18
MICH-11.1 : Pregnant women abstaining from alcohol in past 30 days (percent, 15–44 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 89.4 (2007–08)
2020 Target: 98.3 1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), SAMHSA
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Health Insurance Status for MICH-11.1

MICH-11.1 Increase abstinence from alcohol among pregnant women

Pregnant women abstaining from alcohol in past 30 days (percent, 15–44 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 89.4 (2007–08)
2020 Target: 98.3 1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Spotlight on Disparities:
Health Insurance Status 2017-18 Disparity
Public 92.8
CI 90.2/94.7
SE 1.124
x 1.000
Best rate
Private 87.8
CI 84.4/90.6
SE 1.579
x 1.056
CI
1.000/ 1.095

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Health Insurance Status — 2017-18
  • The better group rate for this objective, 92.8%, was attained by persons with public insurance.
  • The worse group rate for this objective, 87.8%, was attained by persons with private insurance.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 5.0 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the worst group rate.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Health Insurance Status — 2017-18

Persons with public insurance achieved the better group rate for this objective, 92.8%.

The better group rate was <1.1 times the rate among persons with private insurance.

FootnotesShow Footnotes