Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details HDS-9.2 by Health Insurance Status for 2005-08

Disparities Details by Health Insurance Status for 2005-08
HDS-9.2 : Adults with prehypertension who meet the recommended guidelines for saturated fat consumption (age adjusted, percent, 18+ years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 31.4 (2005–08)
2020 Target: 35.7 1, 2
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Health Insurance Status for HDS-9.2

HDS-9.2 Increase the proportion of adults with prehypertension who meet the recommended guidelines for saturated fat consumption

Adults with prehypertension who meet the recommended guidelines for saturated fat consumption (age adjusted, percent, 18+ years)

2020 Baseline (year): 31.4 (2005–08)
2020 Target: 35.7 1, 2
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Health Insurance Status 2005-08 Disparity
Uninsured 35.5
CI 32.2/38.8
SE 1.623
x 1.000
Best rate
Public 34.5
CI 30.7/38.3
SE 1.864
x 1.027
CI
1.000/ 1.154
Private 29.5
CI 26.1/32.9
SE 1.664
x 1.201
CI
1.000/ 1.353
Average group rate excluding best group rate 31.3
...
SE 2.100
x 1.132
CI 1.000/ 1.293

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Health Insurance Status — 2005-08
  • The best group rate for this objective, 35.5% (age adjusted), was attained by uninsured persons.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 29.5% (age adjusted), was attained by persons with private insurance.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 5.9 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was 1.201 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was 1.132 times the average rate for all other health insurance status groups (excluding the best), 31.3% (age adjusted).
Detailed measures of health disparities by Health Insurance Status — 2005-08

Uninsured persons achieved the best group rate for this objective, 35.5% (age adjusted).

The best group rate was:

  • <1.1 times the rate among persons with public insurance.
  • 1.184 times the rate among insured persons.
  • 1.201 times the rate among persons with private insurance.
FootnotesShow Footnotes