Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details HDS-6 by Geographic Location for 2017

Disparities Details by Geographic Location for 2017
HDS-6 : Adults having blood cholesterol screening in past 5 years (age adjusted, percent, 18+ years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 74.6 (2008)
2020 Target: 82.1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Geographic Location for HDS-6

HDS-6 Increase the proportion of adults who have had their blood cholesterol checked within the preceding 5 years

Adults having blood cholesterol screening in past 5 years (age adjusted, percent, 18+ years)

2020 Baseline (year): 74.6 (2008)
2020 Target: 82.1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Spotlight on Disparities:
Geographic Location 2017 Disparity
Metropolitan 88.9
CI 88.3/89.5
SE 0.327
x 1.000
Best rate
Non-metropolitan 81.0
CI 79.2/82.8
SE 0.906
x 1.097
CI
1.000/ 1.119

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Geographic Location — 2017
  • The better group rate for this objective, 88.9% (age adjusted), was attained by persons living in a metropolitan area.
  • The worse group rate for this objective, 81.0% (age adjusted), was attained by persons living in a non-metropolitan area.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 7.9 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the worst group rate.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Geographic Location — 2017

Persons living in a metropolitan area achieved the better group rate for this objective, 88.9% (age adjusted).

The better group rate was <1.1 times the rate among persons living in a non-metropolitan area.

FootnotesShow Footnotes