Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details HDS-23 by Geographic Region for 2014

Disparities Details by Geographic Region for 2014
HDS-23 : Stroke survivors assessed for and/or referred to stroke rehabilitation services (percent)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 96.2 (2009)
2020 Target: Not applicable
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: Get With the Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-Stroke), American Heart Association and American Stroke Association (AHA and ASA)
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Geographic Region for HDS-23

HDS-23 Increase the proportion of adult stroke survivors who are assessed for and/or referred to rehabilitation services.

Stroke survivors assessed for and/or referred to stroke rehabilitation services (percent)

2020 Baseline (year): 96.2 (2009)
2020 Target: Not applicable
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Spotlight on Disparities:
Geographic Region 2014 Disparity
Northeast 98.3
CI 98.2/98.4
SE 0.050
x 1.000
Best rate
South 98.1
CI 98.1/98.2
SE 0.040
x 1.001
CI
1.000/ 1.002
West 98.0
CI 97.9/98.1
SE 0.060
x 1.003
CI
1.000/ 1.004
Midwest 97.5
CI 97.4/97.6
SE 0.066
x 1.008
CI
1.000/ 1.009
Average group rate excluding best group rate 97.9
...
SE 0.069
x 1.004
CI 1.000/ 1.005

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Geographic Region — 2014
  • The best group rate for this objective, 98.3%, was attained by persons treated in hospitals located in the Northeast.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, %, was attained by persons treated in hospitals located in the Midwest.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 0.7 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the average rate for all other geographic region groups (excluding the best), 97.9%.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Geographic Region — 2014

Persons treated in hospitals located in the Northeast achieved the best group rate for this objective, 98.3%.

The best group rate was:

  • <1.1 times the rate among persons treated in hospitals located in the South.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons treated in hospitals located in the West.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons treated in hospitals located in the Midwest.
FootnotesShow Footnotes