Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details HDS-23 by Geographic Region for 2009

Disparities Details by Geographic Region for 2009
HDS-23 : Stroke survivors assessed for and/or referred to stroke rehabilitation services (percent)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 96.2 (2009)
2020 Target: Not applicable
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: Get With the Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-Stroke), American Heart Association and American Stroke Association (AHA and ASA)
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Geographic Region for HDS-23

HDS-23 Increase the proportion of adult stroke survivors who are assessed for and/or referred to rehabilitation services.

Stroke survivors assessed for and/or referred to stroke rehabilitation services (percent)

2020 Baseline (year): 96.2 (2009)
2020 Target: Not applicable
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Geographic Region 2009 Disparity
Northeast 96.4
CI 96.3/96.6
SE 0.082
x 1.000
Best rate
Midwest 96.4
CI 96.2/96.6
SE 0.092
x 1.000
CI
1.000/ 1.002
West 96.4
CI 96.2/96.6
SE 0.101
x 1.001
CI
1.000/ 1.003
South 95.9
CI 95.8/96.0
SE 0.072
x 1.006
CI
1.000/ 1.007
Average group rate excluding best group rate 96.2
...
SE 0.109
x 1.002
CI 1.000/ 1.005

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Geographic Region — 2009
  • The best group rate for this objective, 96.4%, was attained by persons treated in hospitals located in the Northeast.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, %, was attained by persons treated in hospitals located in the South.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 0.5 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the average rate for all other geographic region groups (excluding the best), 96.2%.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Geographic Region — 2009

Persons treated in hospitals located in the Northeast achieved the best group rate for this objective, 96.4%.

The best group rate was:

  • <1.1 times the rate among persons treated in hospitals located in the Midwest.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons treated in hospitals located in the West.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons treated in hospitals located in the South.
FootnotesShow Footnotes