Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details HDS-19.3 by Geographic Region for 2014

Disparities Details by Geographic Region for 2014
HDS-19.3 : Stroke patients receiving acute reperfusion therapy within 3 hours of symptom onset (percent)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 74.1 (2009)
2020 Target: 81.5
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: Get With the Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-Stroke), American Heart Association and American Stroke Association (AHA and ASA)
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Geographic Region for HDS-19.3

HDS-19.3 Increase the proportion of eligible patients with strokes who receive acute reperfusion therapy within 3 hours from symptom onset

Stroke patients receiving acute reperfusion therapy within 3 hours of symptom onset (percent)

2020 Baseline (year): 74.1 (2009)
2020 Target: 81.5
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Spotlight on Disparities:
Geographic Region 2014 Disparity
Northeast 89.8
CI 88.9/90.7
SE 0.441
x 1.000
Best rate
West 89.6
CI 88.8/90.5
SE 0.426
x 1.002
CI
1.000/ 1.013
South 88.7
CI 88.0/89.4
SE 0.355
x 1.012
CI
1.000/ 1.023
Midwest 84.9
CI 83.8/86.1
SE 0.581
x 1.057
CI
1.000/ 1.072
Average group rate excluding best group rate 87.8
...
SE 0.568
x 1.023
CI 1.000/ 1.037

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Geographic Region — 2014
  • The best group rate for this objective, 89.8%, was attained by persons treated in hospitals located in the Northeast.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, %, was attained by persons treated in hospitals located in the Midwest.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 4.9 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the average rate for all other geographic region groups (excluding the best), 87.8%.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Geographic Region — 2014

Persons treated in hospitals located in the Northeast achieved the best group rate for this objective, 89.8%.

The best group rate was:

  • <1.1 times the rate among persons treated in hospitals located in the West.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons treated in hospitals located in the South.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons treated in hospitals located in the Midwest.
FootnotesShow Footnotes