Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details HDS-17.3 by Family Type for 2009

Disparities Details by Family Type for 2009
HDS-17.3 : Adults who are aware of the importance of calling 9–1–1 for a stroke (age adjusted, percent, 20+ years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 92.7 (2009)
2020 Target: 94.7
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Family Type for HDS-17.3

HDS-17.3 Increase the proportion of adults aged 20 years and older who are aware of the importance of accessing rapid emergency care for a stroke by calling 9–1–1 or another emergency number

Adults who are aware of the importance of calling 9–1–1 for a stroke (age adjusted, percent, 20+ years)

2020 Baseline (year): 92.7 (2009)
2020 Target: 94.7
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Family Type 2009 Disparity
Single parent with children 95.6
CI 94.4/96.9
SE 0.620
x 1.000
Best rate
Two parent family with children 94.4
CI 93.5/95.4
SE 0.489
x 1.013
CI
1.000/ 1.027
Married couple or partners 93.7
CI 92.7/94.6
SE 0.467
x 1.021
CI
1.000/ 1.035
Single 92.7
CI 91.9/93.4
SE 0.378
x 1.032
CI
1.000/ 1.045
Other 91.1
CI 90.1/92.0
SE 0.498
x 1.050
CI
1.000/ 1.065
Average group rate excluding best group rate 93.0
...
SE 0.532
x 1.029
CI 1.000/ 1.044

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Family Type — 2009
  • The best group rate for this objective, 95.6% (age adjusted), was attained by persons who identify their family type as single parent with children.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 91.1% (age adjusted), was attained by persons who identify their family type as other.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 4.6 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the average rate for all other family type groups (excluding the best), 93.0% (age adjusted).
Detailed measures of health disparities by Family Type — 2009

Persons who identify their family type as single parent with children achieved the best group rate for this objective, 95.6% (age adjusted).

The best group rate was:

  • <1.1 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as two parent family with children.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as married couple or partners.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as single.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as other.
FootnotesShow Footnotes