Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details HDS-17.3 by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for 2009

Disparities Details by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for 2009
HDS-17.3 : Adults who are aware of the importance of calling 9–1–1 for a stroke (age adjusted, percent, 20+ years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 92.7 (2009)
2020 Target: 94.7
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for HDS-17.3

HDS-17.3 Increase the proportion of adults aged 20 years and older who are aware of the importance of accessing rapid emergency care for a stroke by calling 9–1–1 or another emergency number

Adults who are aware of the importance of calling 9–1–1 for a stroke (age adjusted, percent, 20+ years)

2020 Baseline (year): 92.7 (2009)
2020 Target: 94.7
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Family Income (percent poverty threshold) 2009 Disparity
600+ 94.3
CI 93.2/95.3
SE 0.550
x 1.000
Best rate
400-599 94.1
CI 93.0/95.1
SE 0.532
x 1.002
CI
1.000/ 1.016
200-399 93.0
CI 92.2/93.8
SE 0.386
x 1.014
CI
1.000/ 1.026
100-199 91.2
CI 90.1/92.3
SE 0.578
x 1.034
CI
1.000/ 1.048
<100 89.1
CI 87.6/90.6
SE 0.772
x 1.058
CI
1.000/ 1.076
Average group rate excluding best group rate 91.8
...
SE 0.674
x 1.026
CI 1.000/ 1.042

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) — 2009
  • The best group rate for this objective, 94.3% (age adjusted), was attained by persons whose family incomes were 600+% of the poverty threshold.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 89.1% (age adjusted), was attained by persons whose family incomes were <100% of the poverty threshold.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 5.1 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the average rate for all other family income groups (excluding the best), 91.8% (age adjusted).
Detailed measures of health disparities by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) — 2009

Persons whose family incomes were 600+% of the poverty threshold achieved the best group rate for this objective, 94.3% (age adjusted).

The best group rate was:

  • <1.1 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 400-599% of the poverty threshold.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 200-399% of the poverty threshold.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 100-199% of the poverty threshold.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were <100% of the poverty threshold.
FootnotesShow Footnotes