Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details HDS-16.3 by Family Type for 2014

Disparities Details by Family Type for 2014
HDS-16.3 : Adults who are aware of the importance of calling 9–1–1 for a heart attack (age adjusted, percent, 20+ years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 91.8 (2008)
2020 Target: 93.8 1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Family Type for HDS-16.3

HDS-16.3 Increase the proportion of adults aged 20 years and older who are aware of the importance of accessing rapid emergency care for a heart attack by calling 9–1–1 or another emergency number

Adults who are aware of the importance of calling 9–1–1 for a heart attack (age adjusted, percent, 20+ years)

2020 Baseline (year): 91.8 (2008)
2020 Target: 93.8 1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Family Type 2014 Disparity
Single parent with children 94.7
CI 93.4/96.0
SE 0.670
x 1.000
Best rate
Two parent family with children 94.0
CI 91.4/96.6
SE 1.329
x 1.008
CI
1.000/ 1.034
Married couple or partners 93.9
CI 93.0/94.7
SE 0.441
x 1.009
CI
1.000/ 1.023
Single 93.3
CI 92.7/94.0
SE 0.330
x 1.015
CI
1.000/ 1.028
Other 91.9
CI 90.8/93.0
SE 0.566
x 1.031
CI
1.000/ 1.047
Average group rate excluding best group rate 93.3
...
SE 0.892
x 1.015
CI 1.000/ 1.035

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Family Type — 2014
  • The best group rate for this objective, 94.7% (age adjusted), was attained by persons who identify their family type as single parent with children.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 91.9% (age adjusted), was attained by persons who identify their family type as other.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 2.8 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the average rate for all other family type groups (excluding the best), 93.3% (age adjusted).
Detailed measures of health disparities by Family Type — 2014

Persons who identify their family type as single parent with children achieved the best group rate for this objective, 94.7% (age adjusted).

The best group rate was:

  • <1.1 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as two parent family with children.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as married couple or partners.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as single.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as other.
FootnotesShow Footnotes