Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details FP-9.2 by Disability Status for 2011-15

Disparities Details by Disability Status for 2011-15
FP-9.2 : Adolescent males who have never had sexual intercourse (percent, 15–17 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 72.0 (2006–10)
2020 Target: 79.2 1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Disability Status for FP-9.2

FP-9.2 Increase the proportion of male adolescents aged 15 to 17 years who have never had sexual intercourse

Adolescent males who have never had sexual intercourse (percent, 15–17 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 72.0 (2006–10)
2020 Target: 79.2 1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Disability Status 2011-15 Disparity
People without disabilities 69.1
CI 65.3/72.7
SE 1.872
x 1.000
Best rate
People with disabilities 65.6
CI 57.6/72.9
SE 3.878
x 1.054
CI
1.000/ 1.173

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Disability Status — 2011-15
  • The better group rate for this objective, 69.1%, was attained by persons without disabilities.
  • The worse group rate for this objective, 65.6%, was attained by persons with disabilities.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 3.5 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the worst group rate.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Disability Status — 2011-15

Persons without disabilities achieved the better group rate for this objective, 69.1%.

The better group rate was <1.1 times the rate among persons with disabilities.

FootnotesShow Footnotes