Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details FP-7.2 by Family Type for 2011-15

Disparities Details by Family Type for 2011-15
FP-7.2 : Sexually active males receiving reproductive health services (percent, 15–44 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 14.8 (2006–10)
2020 Target: 16.3 1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Family Type for FP-7.2

FP-7.2 Increase the proportion of sexually active males aged 15 to 44 years who received reproductive health services

Sexually active males receiving reproductive health services (percent, 15–44 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 14.8 (2006–10)
2020 Target: 16.3 1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Family Type 2011-15 Disparity
Single 21.0
CI 18.4/23.7
SE 1.341
x 1.000
Best rate
Married couple or partners 11.8
CI 9.3/14.8
SE 1.368
x 1.779
CI
1.000/ 2.213
Two parent family with children 8.5
CI 7.0/10.2
SE 0.821
x 2.477
CI
1.000/ 2.999
Average group rate excluding best group rate 10.1
...
SE 1.595
x 2.071
CI 1.000/ 2.740

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Family Type — 2011-15
  • The best group rate for this objective, 21.0%, was attained by persons who identify their family type as single.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 8.5%, was attained by persons who identify their family type as two parent family with children.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 12.5 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was 2.477 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was 2.071 times the average rate for all other family type groups (excluding the best), 10.1%.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Family Type — 2011-15

Persons who identify their family type as single achieved the best group rate for this objective, 21.0%.

The best group rate was:

  • 1.779 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as married couple or partners.
  • 2.477 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as two parent family with children.
FootnotesShow Footnotes