Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details FP-7.2 by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for 2006-10

Disparities Details by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for 2006-10
FP-7.2 : Sexually active males receiving reproductive health services (percent, 15–44 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 14.8 (2006–10)
2020 Target: 16.3 1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for FP-7.2

FP-7.2 Increase the proportion of sexually active males aged 15 to 44 years who received reproductive health services

Sexually active males receiving reproductive health services (percent, 15–44 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 14.8 (2006–10)
2020 Target: 16.3 1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Family Income (percent poverty threshold) 2006-10 2 Disparity
<100 21.8
CI 17.8/26.4
SE 2.166
x 1.000
Best rate
100-199 14.5
CI 12.2/17.2
SE 1.241
x 1.502
CI
1.000/ 1.863
200-399 13.9
CI 12.0/16.0
SE 1.024
x 1.571
CI
1.000/ 1.925
500+ 13.3
CI 9.9/17.7
SE 1.948
x 1.641
CI
1.000/ 2.196
400-499 11.8
CI 9.1/15.1
SE 1.506
x 1.849
CI
1.000/ 2.413
Average group rate excluding best group rate 13.4
...
SE 1.698
x 1.631
CI 1.000/ 2.126

2 Baseline has been revised. See Data Details for more information.

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) — 2006-10
  • The best group rate for this objective, 21.8%, was attained by persons whose family incomes were <100% of the poverty threshold.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 11.8%, was attained by persons whose family incomes were 400-499% of the poverty threshold.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 10.0 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was 1.849 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was 1.631 times the average rate for all other family income groups (excluding the best), 13.4%.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) — 2006-10

Persons whose family incomes were <100% of the poverty threshold achieved the best group rate for this objective, 21.8%.

The best group rate was:

  • 1.502 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 100-199% of the poverty threshold.
  • 1.571 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 200-399% of the poverty threshold.
  • 1.641 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 500+% of the poverty threshold.
  • 1.849 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 400-499% of the poverty threshold.
FootnotesShow Footnotes