Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details FP-6 by Geographic Location for 2011-15

Disparities Details by Geographic Location for 2011-15
FP-6 : Contraceptive use at most recent sexual intercourse by females at risk of unintended pregnancy or use by their partners (percent, females 15–44 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 83.3 (2006–10)
2020 Target: 91.6 1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Geographic Location for FP-6

FP-6 Increase the proportion of females at risk of unintended pregnancy or their partners who used contraception at most recent sexual intercourse

Contraceptive use at most recent sexual intercourse by females at risk of unintended pregnancy or use by their partners (percent, females 15–44 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 83.3 (2006–10)
2020 Target: 91.6 1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Geographic Location 2011-15 Disparity
Non-metropolitan 85.4
CI 81.8/88.3
SE 1.660
x 1.000
Best rate
Metropolitan 80.5
CI 78.6/82.2
SE 0.927
x 1.061
CI
1.000/ 1.101

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Geographic Location — 2011-15
  • The better group rate for this objective, 85.4%, was attained by persons living in a non-metropolitan area.
  • The worse group rate for this objective, 80.5%, was attained by persons living in a metropolitan area.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 4.9 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the worst group rate.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Geographic Location — 2011-15

Persons living in a non-metropolitan area achieved the better group rate for this objective, 85.4%.

The better group rate was <1.1 times the rate among persons living in a metropolitan area.

FootnotesShow Footnotes