Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details FP-5 by Marital Status for 2015-17

Disparities Details by Marital Status for 2015-17
FP-5 : Pregnancies conceived within 18 months of a previous birth (percent, females 15–44 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 33.1 (2006–10)
2020 Target: 29.8 1
Desired Direction: ↓ Decrease Desired
Data Source: National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Marital Status for FP-5

FP-5 Reduce the proportion of pregnancies conceived within 18 months of a previous birth

Pregnancies conceived within 18 months of a previous birth (percent, females 15–44 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 33.1 (2006–10)
2020 Target: 29.8 1
Desired Direction: ↓ Decrease Desired
Spotlight on Disparities:
Marital Status 2015-17 Disparity
Married 35.4
CI 29.2/42.1
SE 3.236
÷ 1.000
Best rate
Widowed 38.3
CI 30.3/46.9
SE 4.173
÷ 1.081
CI
1.000/ 1.366

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Marital Status — 2015-17
  • The better group rate for this objective, 35.4%, was attained by persons who were married.
  • The worse group rate for this objective, 38.3%, was attained by persons who were widowed.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 2.9 percentage points.
  • The worst group rate was <1.100 times the best group rate.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Marital Status — 2015-17

Persons who were married achieved the better group rate for this objective, 35.4%.

The rate among persons who were widowed was <1.1 times the better group rate.

FootnotesShow Footnotes