Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details FP-2 by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for 2002

Disparities Details by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for 2002
FP-2 : Females experiencing pregnancy due to contraceptive failure (percent, 15–44 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 12.4 (2002)
2020 Target: 9.9
Desired Direction: ↓ Decrease Desired
Data Source: National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), CDC/NCHS; Guttmacher Institute Abortion Provider Survey (APS), Guttmacher Institute
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for FP-2

FP-2 Reduce the proportion of females experiencing pregnancy despite use of a reversible contraceptive method

Females experiencing pregnancy due to contraceptive failure (percent, 15–44 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 12.4 (2002)
2020 Target: 9.9
Desired Direction: ↓ Decrease Desired
Family Income (percent poverty threshold) 2002 Disparity
200+ 8.4
CI 7.1/9.9
SE 0
÷ 1.000
Best rate
100-199 17.8
CI 17.3/18.4
SE 0
÷ 2.119
<100 19.9
CI 19.3/20.6
SE 0
÷ 2.369
Average group rate excluding best group rate 18.8
...
SE
÷ 2.244
CI /

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) — 2002
  • The best group rate for this objective, 8.4%, was attained by persons whose family incomes were 200+% of the poverty threshold.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 19.9%, was attained by persons whose family incomes were <100% of the poverty threshold.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 11.5 percentage points.
  • The worst group rate was 2.369 times the best group rate.
  • The average rate for all other family income groups (excluding the best), 18.9%, was 2.244 times the best group rate.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) — 2002

Persons whose family incomes were 200+% of the poverty threshold achieved the best group rate for this objective, 8.4%.

  • The rate among persons whose family incomes were 100-199% of the poverty threshold was 2.119 times the best group rate.
  • The rate among persons whose family incomes were <100% of the poverty threshold was 2.369 times the best group rate.
FootnotesShow Footnotes