Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details FP-10.4 by Health Insurance Status for 2015-17

Disparities Details by Health Insurance Status for 2015-17
FP-10.4 : Condom use at last intercourse by sexually active adolescent males (percent, 15–19 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 74.1 (2006–10)
2020 Target: 81.5 1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Health Insurance Status for FP-10.4

FP-10.4 Increase the proportion of sexually active males aged 15 to 19 years who use a condom at last intercourse

Condom use at last intercourse by sexually active adolescent males (percent, 15–19 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 74.1 (2006–10)
2020 Target: 81.5 1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Spotlight on Disparities:
Health Insurance Status 2015-17 Disparity
Private 75.1
CI 62.4/84.6
SE 5.567
x 1.000
Best rate
Public 67.4
CI 55.5/77.4
SE 5.546
x 1.114
CI
1.000/ 1.337

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Health Insurance Status — 2015-17
  • The better group rate for this objective, 75.1%, was attained by persons with private insurance.
  • The worse group rate for this objective, 67.4%, was attained by persons with public insurance.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 7.7 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was 1.114 times the worst group rate.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Health Insurance Status — 2015-17

Persons with private insurance achieved the better group rate for this objective, 75.1%.

The better group rate was 1.114 times the rate among persons with public insurance.

FootnotesShow Footnotes