Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details D-5.1 by Sex for 2013-16

Disparities Details by Sex for 2013-16
D-5.1 : Persons with diagnosed diabetes whose A1c value is greater than 9% (age adjusted, percent, 18+ years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 18.0 (2005–08)
2020 Target: 16.2 1, 3
Desired Direction: ↓ Decrease Desired
Data Source: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Sex for D-5.1

D-5.1 Reduce the proportion of persons with diabetes with an A1c value greater than 9 percent

Persons with diagnosed diabetes whose A1c value is greater than 9% (age adjusted, percent, 18+ years)

2020 Baseline (year): 18.0 (2005–08)
2020 Target: 16.2 1, 3
Desired Direction: ↓ Decrease Desired
Spotlight on Disparities:
Sex 2013-16 Disparity
Female 17.4
CI 12.8/23.3
SE 2.553
÷ 1.000
Best rate
Male 20.0
CI 13.7/28.3
SE 3.567
÷ 1.151
CI
1.000/ 1.682

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Sex — 2013-16
  • The better group rate for this objective, 17.4% (age adjusted), was attained by the female population.
  • The worse group rate for this objective, 20.0% (age adjusted), was attained by the male population.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 2.6 percentage points.
  • The worst group rate was 1.151 times the best group rate.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Sex — 2013-16

The female population achieved the better group rate for this objective, 17.4% (age adjusted).

The rate for male the population was 1.151 times the better group rate.

FootnotesShow Footnotes