Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details D-10 by Family Type for 2017

Disparities Details by Family Type for 2017
D-10 : Annual dilated eye examinations among adults with diagnosed diabetes (age adjusted, percent, 18+ years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 53.4 (2008)
2020 Target: 58.7
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Family Type for D-10

D-10 Increase the proportion of adults with diabetes who have an annual dilated eye examination

Annual dilated eye examinations among adults with diagnosed diabetes (age adjusted, percent, 18+ years)

2020 Baseline (year): 53.4 (2008)
2020 Target: 58.7
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Spotlight on Disparities:
Family Type 2017 Disparity
Married couple or partners 66.5
CI 58.3/74.8
SE 4.198
x 1.000
Best rate
Single 64.1
CI 56.8/71.5
SE 3.726
x 1.037
CI
1.000/ 1.195
Other 63.1
CI 56.3/69.9
SE 3.470
x 1.054
CI
1.000/ 1.210
Two parent family with children 47.1
CI 39.3/54.8
SE 3.943
x 1.414
CI
1.000/ 1.680
Average group rate excluding best group rate 58.1
...
SE 4.554
x 1.145
CI 1.000/ 1.351

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Family Type — 2017
  • The best group rate for this objective, 66.5% (age adjusted), was attained by persons who identify their family type as married couple or partners.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 47.1% (age adjusted), was attained by persons who identify their family type as two parent family with children.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 19.5 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was 1.414 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was 1.145 times the average rate for all other family type groups (excluding the best), 58.1% (age adjusted).
Detailed measures of health disparities by Family Type — 2017

Persons who identify their family type as married couple or partners achieved the best group rate for this objective, 66.5% (age adjusted).

The best group rate was:

  • <1.1 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as single.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as other.
  • 1.414 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as two parent family with children.
FootnotesShow Footnotes