Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details D-10 by Family Type for 2016

Disparities Details by Family Type for 2016
D-10 : Annual dilated eye examinations among adults with diagnosed diabetes (age adjusted, percent, 18+ years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 53.4 (2008)
2020 Target: 58.7
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Family Type for D-10

D-10 Increase the proportion of adults with diabetes who have an annual dilated eye examination

Annual dilated eye examinations among adults with diagnosed diabetes (age adjusted, percent, 18+ years)

2020 Baseline (year): 53.4 (2008)
2020 Target: 58.7
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Family Type 2016 Disparity
Married couple or partners 70.4
CI 61.6/79.2
SE 4.504
x 1.000
Best rate
Two parent family with children 59.8
CI 52.0/67.5
SE 3.943
x 1.178
CI
1.000/ 1.370
Single 56.0
CI 47.9/64.0
SE 4.095
x 1.258
CI
1.000/ 1.476
Other 54.3
CI 46.8/61.8
SE 3.814
x 1.297
CI
1.000/ 1.516
Single parent with children 49.0
CI 37.5/60.4
SE 5.856
x 1.438
CI
1.000/ 1.797
Average group rate excluding best group rate 54.7
...
SE 5.201
x 1.286
CI 1.000/ 1.552

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Family Type — 2016
  • The best group rate for this objective, 70.4% (age adjusted), was attained by persons who identify their family type as married couple or partners.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 49.0% (age adjusted), was attained by persons who identify their family type as single parent with children.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 21.4 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was 1.438 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was 1.286 times the average rate for all other family type groups (excluding the best), 54.7% (age adjusted).
Detailed measures of health disparities by Family Type — 2016

Persons who identify their family type as married couple or partners achieved the best group rate for this objective, 70.4% (age adjusted).

The best group rate was:

  • 1.178 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as two parent family with children.
  • 1.258 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as single.
  • 1.297 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as other.
  • 1.438 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as single parent with children.
FootnotesShow Footnotes