Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details D-10 by Family Type for 2008

Disparities Details by Family Type for 2008
D-10 : Annual dilated eye examinations among adults with diagnosed diabetes (age adjusted, percent, 18+ years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 53.4 (2008)
2020 Target: 58.7
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Family Type for D-10

D-10 Increase the proportion of adults with diabetes who have an annual dilated eye examination

Annual dilated eye examinations among adults with diagnosed diabetes (age adjusted, percent, 18+ years)

2020 Baseline (year): 53.4 (2008)
2020 Target: 58.7
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Family Type 2008 Disparity
Single 67.7
CI 60.1/75.4
SE 3.891
x 1.000
Best rate
Single parent with children 60.4
CI 48.4/72.4
SE 6.113
x 1.122
CI
1.000/ 1.358
Other 52.0
CI 44.3/59.6
SE 3.920
x 1.304
CI
1.000/ 1.524
Married couple or partners 51.1
CI 40.0/62.2
SE 5.669
x 1.326
CI
1.000/ 1.629
Two parent family with children 45.8
CI 35.4/56.2
SE 5.288
x 1.479
CI
1.000/ 1.829
Average group rate excluding best group rate 52.3
...
SE 6.133
x 1.295
CI 1.000/ 1.605

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Family Type — 2008
  • The best group rate for this objective, 67.7% (age adjusted), was attained by persons who identify their family type as single.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 45.8% (age adjusted), was attained by persons who identify their family type as two parent family with children.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 22.0 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was 1.479 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was 1.295 times the average rate for all other family type groups (excluding the best), 52.3% (age adjusted).
Detailed measures of health disparities by Family Type — 2008

Persons who identify their family type as single achieved the best group rate for this objective, 67.7% (age adjusted).

The best group rate was:

  • 1.122 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as single parent with children.
  • 1.304 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as other.
  • 1.326 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as married couple or partners.
  • 1.479 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as two parent family with children.
FootnotesShow Footnotes