Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details C-16 by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for 2018

Disparities Details by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for 2018
C-16 : Adults receiving colorectal cancer screening based on the most recent guidelines (age-adjusted, percent, 50–75 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 52.1 (2008)
2020 Target: 70.5
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for C-16

C-16 Increase the proportion of adults who receive a colorectal cancer screening based on the most recent guidelines

Adults receiving colorectal cancer screening based on the most recent guidelines (age-adjusted, percent, 50–75 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 52.1 (2008)
2020 Target: 70.5
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Family Income (percent poverty threshold) 2018 Disparity
600+ 74.3
CI 72.3/76.3
SE 1.036
x 1.000
Best rate
400-599 68.7
CI 66.2/71.3
SE 1.285
x 1.081
CI
1.000/ 1.123
200-399 61.8
CI 59.6/64.0
SE 1.127
x 1.202
CI
1.000/ 1.248
100-199 55.4
CI 52.2/58.6
SE 1.625
x 1.342
CI
1.000/ 1.415
<100 53.2
CI 49.7/56.8
SE 1.798
x 1.396
CI
1.000/ 1.482
Average group rate excluding best group rate 59.8
...
SE 1.712
x 1.243
CI 1.000/ 1.310

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) — 2018
  • The best group rate for this objective, 74.3% (age adjusted), was attained by persons whose family incomes were 600+% of the poverty threshold.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 53.2% (age adjusted), was attained by persons whose family incomes were <100% of the poverty threshold.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 21.1 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was 1.396 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was 1.243 times the average rate for all other family income groups (excluding the best), 59.8% (age adjusted).
Detailed measures of health disparities by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) — 2018

Persons whose family incomes were 600+% of the poverty threshold achieved the best group rate for this objective, 74.3% (age adjusted).

The best group rate was:

  • <1.1 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 400-599% of the poverty threshold.
  • 1.202 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 200-399% of the poverty threshold.
  • 1.342 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 100-199% of the poverty threshold.
  • 1.396 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were <100% of the poverty threshold.
FootnotesShow Footnotes