Disparities Details by Geographic Location for 2016
AHS-3 : Persons with a usual primary care provider (percent)
This chart compares rates by population.
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Geographic Location for AHS-3
AHS-3 Increase the proportion of persons with a usual primary care provider
Persons with a usual primary care provider (percent)
| Geographic Location | 2016 | Disparity |
|---|---|---|
| Non-metropolitan | 83.3 CI 80.8/85.7 SE 1.232 |
x 1.000 Best rate |
| Metropolitan | 75.3 CI 74.3/76.3 SE 0.510 |
x 1.105 CI 1.000/ 1.135 |
|
Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release. Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population. Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown. CI: 95% confidence interval. |
||
- The better group rate for this objective, 83.3%, was attained by persons living in a non-metropolitan area.
- The worse group rate for this objective, 75.3%, was attained by persons living in a metropolitan area.
- The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 7.9 percentage points.
- The best group rate was 1.105 times the worst group rate.
Persons living in a non-metropolitan area achieved the better group rate for this objective, 83.3%.
The better group rate was 1.105 times the rate among persons living in a metropolitan area.
