Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details AHS-1.1 by Family Type for 2018

Disparities Details by Family Type for 2018
AHS-1.1 : Persons with medical insurance (percent, under 65 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 83.2 (2008)
2020 Target: 100
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Family Type for AHS-1.1

AHS-1.1 Increase the proportion of persons with medical insurance

Persons with medical insurance (percent, under 65 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 83.2 (2008)
2020 Target: 100
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Spotlight on Disparities:
Family Type 2018 Disparity
Two parent family with children 91.9
CI 91.1/92.6
SE 0.390
x 1.000
Best rate
Single parent with children 91.2
CI 89.9/92.5
SE 0.671
x 1.007
CI
1.000/ 1.021
Married couple or partners 91.2
CI 90.4/91.9
SE 0.391
x 1.007
CI
1.000/ 1.018
Other 86.6
CI 85.8/87.4
SE 0.405
x 1.061
CI
1.000/ 1.072
Single 85.1
CI 84.0/86.2
SE 0.552
x 1.080
CI
1.000/ 1.094
Average group rate excluding best group rate 88.5
...
SE 0.598
x 1.038
CI 1.000/ 1.052

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Family Type — 2018
  • The best group rate for this objective, 91.9%, was attained by persons who identify their family type as two parent family with children.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 85.1%, was attained by persons who identify their family type as single.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 6.8 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the average rate for all other family type groups (excluding the best), 88.5%.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Family Type — 2018

Persons who identify their family type as two parent family with children achieved the best group rate for this objective, 91.9%.

The best group rate was:

  • <1.1 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as single parent with children.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as married couple or partners.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as other.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons who identify their family type as single.
FootnotesShow Footnotes