Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details FP-16.2 by Health Insurance Status for 2011-15

Disparities Details by Health Insurance Status for 2011-15
FP-16.2 : Females at risk of unintended pregnancy using effective contraception (percent, 15–19 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 45.4 (2011–15)
2020 Target: 54.1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Health Insurance Status for FP-16.2

FP-16.2 Increase the percentage of adolescent females aged 15 to 19 years who are at risk of unintended pregnancy that adopt or continue use of the most effective or moderately effective methods of contraception

Females at risk of unintended pregnancy using effective contraception (percent, 15–19 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 45.4 (2011–15)
2020 Target: 54.1
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Health Insurance Status 2011-15 Disparity
Private 51.3
CI 44.2/58.4
SE 3.597
x 1.000
Best rate
Public 40.3
CI 33.5/47.5
SE 3.542
x 1.273
CI
1.000/ 1.531
Average group rate excluding best group rate 43.7
...
SE 4.420
x 1.175
CI 1.000/ 1.439

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Health Insurance Status — 2011-15
  • The best group rate for this objective, 51.3%, was attained by persons with private insurance.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 40.3%, was attained by persons with public insurance.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 11.0 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was 1.273 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was 1.175 times the average rate for all other health insurance status groups (excluding the best), 43.7%.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Health Insurance Status — 2011-15

Persons with private insurance achieved the best group rate for this objective, 51.3%.

The best group rate was:

  • <1.1 times the rate among insured persons.
  • 1.273 times the rate among persons with public insurance.
FootnotesShow Footnotes