Visit coronavirus.gov for the latest Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) updates.

You are here

Disparities Data Details FP-16.1 by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for 2015-17

Disparities Details by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for 2015-17
FP-16.1 : Females at risk of unintended pregnancy using effective contraception (percent, 20–44 years)
This chart compares rates by population.

2020 Baseline (year): 61.2 (2011–15)
2020 Target: 69.3
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Data Source: National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), CDC/NCHS
Error Bar (I) represents the 95% confidence interval.
Additional footnotes may apply to these data. Please refer to footnotes below the data table for further information.
See also Disparities Overview by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) for FP-16.1

FP-16.1 Increase the percentage of adult females aged 20 to 44 years who are at risk of unintended pregnancy that adopt or continue use of the most effective or moderately effective methods of contraception

Females at risk of unintended pregnancy using effective contraception (percent, 20–44 years)

2020 Baseline (year): 61.2 (2011–15)
2020 Target: 69.3
Desired Direction: ↑ Increase Desired
Spotlight on Disparities:
Family Income (percent poverty threshold) 2015-17 Disparity
200-399 63.5
CI 58.9/67.9
SE 2.258
x 1.000
Best rate
<100 62.9
CI 56.7/68.6
SE 2.982
x 1.010
CI
1.000/ 1.114
500+ 61.5
CI 56.1/66.6
SE 2.635
x 1.033
CI
1.000/ 1.133
400-499 57.8
CI 47.6/67.3
SE 4.994
x 1.100
CI
1.000/ 1.282
100-199 53.6
CI 47.9/59.2
SE 2.848
x 1.185
CI
1.000/ 1.316
Average group rate excluding best group rate 58.9
...
SE 4.037
x 1.078
CI 1.000/ 1.224

Data are subject to revision and may have changed since a previous release.

Unless noted otherwise, any age-adjusted data are adjusted using the year 2000 standard population.

Data are not available or not collected for populations not shown.

CI: 95% confidence interval.

Summary measures of health disparities by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) — 2015-17
  • The best group rate for this objective, 63.5%, was attained by persons whose family incomes were 200-399% of the poverty threshold.
  • The worst group rate for this objective, 53.6%, was attained by persons whose family incomes were 100-199% of the poverty threshold.
  • The absolute difference (or range) between the best and worst group rates was 9.9 percentage points.
  • The best group rate was 1.185 times the worst group rate.
  • The best group rate was <1.100 times the average rate for all other family income groups (excluding the best), 58.9%.
Detailed measures of health disparities by Family Income (percent poverty threshold) — 2015-17

Persons whose family incomes were 200-399% of the poverty threshold achieved the best group rate for this objective, 63.5%.

The best group rate was:

  • <1.1 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were <100% of the poverty threshold.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 500+% of the poverty threshold.
  • <1.1 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 400-499% of the poverty threshold.
  • 1.185 times the rate among persons whose family incomes were 100-199% of the poverty threshold.
FootnotesShow Footnotes