|
 |
Managing
and
Sustaining the
Process "Even
if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there."
Will Rogers |
| In
This Section
u Action
Checklist
u Tips
u Process in Action: Examples from the Field
Planning and
Development Checklist
Sample
Time LineOverview
Sample Time
LineDetailed View
µ Hot Picks: Resources |
The
success of a Healthy People initiative (national, state, or local) depends on sustaining
the process, particularly as leadership, administrations, and policy makers change.
Initial commitment and energy of community partners in identifying needs and setting
objectives or targets is only the beginning of the process. Sustainability and
institutionalization of Healthy People in day-to-day activities of many people in diverse
organizations is necessary in order to achieve objectives. Commitment is not a one-time
event, but must grow throughout the next decade. |
Action Checklist:
Managing and Sustaining
the Process
(See a complete
planning and development checklist.)
|
- Designate staff and organizational unit for
coordinating state plan development
- Create a work plan and time line to develop and
release the plan
- Coordinate expertise and staff support
- Assign development tasks to teams or individuals
- Establish and implement processes for ongoing
input
|
- Market development process (see the action area,
"Communicate Health Goals and Objectives")
- Plan periodic reviews
- Integrate state plan into ongoing planning,
budgeting, programming, and legislative processes
- Develop a ten-year monitoring and implementation
plan
|
|
 |
A car
without a driver cant go anywhere
- Identify a person (single point of contact) to
manage the process and ensure that things get done
- Consider establishing an office, with an annual
budget, dedicated to the Healthy People initiative
- Designate a state contact to liaison with the
national Healthy People 2010 initiative
Let everyone know the final destination and
stops along the way
- Develop a time line and designate responsible
parties
- Distribute the time line and tasks to all partners
- Establish a means of continuous communication to
report progress among those involved (consider electronic possibilities)
- Display the relevant time line tasks at each
meeting
- Make sure major partners see tasks on the time
line for them
- Share management responsibilities across agencies
and possibly with the private sector
Integrate the state plan initiative into many
ongoing activities
- Incorporate in strategic and annual plans of
agencies, (e.g., objectives, performance measures, data collection plans)
- Encourage agencies to use the state's Healthy
People logo in their documents that refer to the state plan
- Tie to agency policies and legislative initiatives
- Link to funding proposals and allocations (e.g.,
foundations, state grant funds, legislative budgeting)
Schedule internal, interagency, and public
reviews of the state plan and progress
- Monitor progress toward objectives, legislative
actions, and organizational commitments in the plan
- Time opportunities to review plan with new leaders
and after elections for new terms in office
- Use reviews to revitalize or redirect the
initiative
- Identify successes and areas of focus for public
and private audiences
- Convene periodic summits or conferences around the
state plan to maintain momentum
Remember to celebrate milestones, and
recognize groups and individuals for their contributions
- Use kick-off events to showcase community,
government, and business partners and their commitments
- Find time and resources for certificates of
recognition, plaques, and personal notes
- Invite the governor, respected state leaders, and
national leaders to participate in milestone events (kick-off, announcement of priorities,
draft objectives, etc.)
Be prepared for "postpartum" blues
- Plan activities to follow the "labor and
delivery" of the plan
- Redefine roles of the steering group, work groups,
and others in phases following the release of the plan
- Bring in new partners for a boost of energy
|
|
Process in Action: Examples from the Field
Below are examples of how the nation and states have managed and sustained the
development and implementation process for Healthy People plans.
From the National Initiative
Dedicated staff
The Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
(ODPHP) is designated as the coordinator of the Healthy People initiative. A staff office
reporting to the Assistant Secretary for Health and Surgeon General, ODPHP supports the
Secretarys Council on National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives
for 2010, Healthy People Steering Committee, and the Healthy People Consortium.
Steering Committee
The Healthy People Steering Committee, which meets
quarterly, is composed of representatives from all HHS operating divisions. The group is
responsible for overseeing the drafting, revisions, and final modifications of the Healthy
People document. A list of the Healthy People 2000 Steering Committee members is available
at the following web site: http://www.health.gov/hpcomments/Guide/steering.htm.
Lead agencies
The Assistant Secretary for Health has designated lead
agencies in HHS to be accountable for the achievement of Healthy People targets. Each lead
agency is responsible for monitoring, tracking, and reporting the nation's progress on the
objectives in its focus area. For some areas, two agencies act as co-leads. HHS agency
heads in turn have designated work group coordinators to assume day-to-day
responsibilities for the objectives.
Broad participation and mobilization
ODPHP staff attribute much of the sustained interest in
Healthy People 2010 to the widespread year 2000 participation and buy-in, particularly
between public sector partners and private non-profit groups. With virtually all states
and 70 percent of local communities participating in the year 2000 initiative, vested
communities create a strong demand for continuing the 2010 objectives. A critical mass of
participation and positive peer pressure fuel partners' continued desire to be "on
board" this popular initiative.
Another reason for the sustainability of the Healthy
People Initiative is the many Consortium members from the private and voluntary sectors
who have used and promoted the objectives as a framework for their constituents' action.
As an example, the American Hospital Association developed Healthy People 2000:
America's Hospitals Respond, a resource kit for hospital administrators to help
mobilize health promotion initiatives. The American Dietetic Association (ADA) developed Call
to Action to inspire its more than 64,000 members to pursue the nutrition objectives.
These and other initiatives of Consortium members continue to sustain Healthy People at
multiple levels.
From State Initiatives
Identify key staff to manage the state plan
All states and territories identify Healthy People state
action contacts. Among these, four have appointed staff solely devoted to Healthy People
coordination. These four state action contacts have been instrumental in establishing a
development plan early and sustaining the effort throughout the decade. A current listing
of the state action contacts is included in the Toolkit and available at: http://www.healthypeople.gov/HPScripts/StateContact.asp.
As another example, North Carolina has established
an Office of Healthy Carolinians that is responsible for keeping the initiative on track.
Staff are available to North Carolina counties for support and training, particularly
coalition building. There is also a governors task force that certifies counties in
the Healthy Carolinians project. The counties do an assessment and then implement an
action plan.
The Connecticut Department of Health kept year 2000
planning on track with the help of two staff assigned to the process and an internal
advisory committee. The year 2000 process was expanded with the development of Looking
Toward 2000An Assessment of Health Status and Health Services. Connecticut
formed the state health planning coordinating committee responsible for analyzing health
status data, service data, program plans, and objectives for the Assessment. The
committee reconvened to review and coordinate the Department's response to Healthy
People 2010Draft for Public Comment.
Although desirable, an official coordinator is not
imperative to success. Because of funding deficiencies, Wyoming lost its Healthy
People 2000 coordinator. However, due to individual efforts from key personnel who had
"bought into" the process, Wyoming was able to carry on with year 2000
activities.
The Delaware Division of Public Health used a
combination of state and grant funds to hire a private consulting group to help manage the
development of Healthy Delaware 2010. The Division of Public Health retained
responsibilities for convening and leading the steering group, as well as providing
technical and administrative support to work groups. The consultants will assist by
managing the time line, identifying technical tasks for staff, developing a marketing
plan, coordinating community meetings, and preparing the plan for publication.
Maintain communications among partners
The Iowa State Department of Health is working with
the Hardin Library for the Health Sciences and College of Medicine at the University of
Iowa in establishing listservers by teams, by team leaders and facilitators, and for all
chapter team members with e-mail addresses, so they can interact via the Internet. This is
a key component in the communication process. (See "Communicating Health Goals and
Objectives.")
Since June 1998, Kentucky has been working on their
year 2010 plans. The state has assigned 26 team leaders to form committees around each
year 2010 chapter, with a key contact appointed to oversee each committees progress.
Monthly meetings are held with most of the team leaders with regular phone contact in
between. A majority of the team leaders hold monthly meetings with their committees as
well.
Share management responsibilities across departments
New Jerseys health department
formed an Interdepartmental Steering Committee to oversee development of the year 2010
public health agenda. The committee established a work plan with specific target dates for
each step required to complete the document. The committee consists of key staff from
within the health department as well as other state departments such as Human Services,
Environmental Protection, Education, and Law and Public Safety.
Vermont began with work groups for its
identified priority areas. These groups consisted of both Department of Health employees
and other agency people. However, these formal groups did not work effectively, and the
state discovered that more informal meetings and discussion with these groups worked
better.
Integrate Healthy People initiative with other key projects
The Benchmarks Project was a part of Oregons
strategic plan and is therefore supported by the governor. State Healthy People objectives
influenced the selection of Oregon benchmarks. The Oregon Progress Board monitors the
benchmarks and reports on progress toward long term performance targets. Oregon Benchmarks
are part of the biennial budget process. Agencies must identify benchmark links and report
on progress toward achieving the performance targets. Results are reported in a biennial
report to the legislature.
By combining the planning processes for the Agency
Strategic Plan, mandated performance-based program budgeting, and the State Health Plan,
the Florida Department of Health was able to create an ongoing planning process
that encompasses both long- and short-range program planning. Through performance based
program budgeting, specific outcomes were linked to resource requirements in budgets
submitted to the state legislature.
(See also state
examples) |
Planning and Development
Checklist
The Planning and Development Checklist is a tool for
organizing and tracking the development of a state health plan. The Checklist outlines
potential tasks under each of seven critical action areas to develop, manage, and promote
a successful state plan. The seven action areas were identified as the common threads
found in the national and state Healthy People processes. This list serves as a menu of
activities and processes from the beginning of the development process through the final
evaluation of the plan in the next decade, as well as a tool for monitoring progress of
plan development.
Individual activities listed for each component should be
evaluated and adapted for use in a way that best fits the needs of the state. Additional
activities may be added in the space at the end of each section's checklist.
Because many activities run well concurrently, skillful
integration of these components will lead to an efficient and effective process. For
example, identification and engagement of partners can help in engaging leaders and
securing resources. Refer to the sample time
line, which illustrates concurrent activities.
Tasks for which tools are available in the Toolkit are identified
by page number and with the tool icon.
|
Activity Deemed Relevant |
Process Initiated |
Process Completed |
Comments |
| Build the
Foundation: Leadership and Structure |
- Secure buy-in and commitment to develop state plan from
senior health department staff (including state health official, state
epidemiologist,
vital statistics director, chronic disease coordinator, and the Healthy People 2010
Coordinator)
|
|
|
|
|
- Meet internally and form preparation team to identify goals
and guide early stages of development
|
|
|
|
|
- Create a structure for the planning process
See
Creating a Structure for Success
See
Sample 2010 Planning Structures
|
|
|
|
|
- Examine policy/political environment (e.g., current
policies, governors priorities, legislative agenda, legislative mandates)
|
|
|
|
|
- Define functions and composition of an advisory group
and/or steering committee
See
Participant Roles & Responsibilities
|
|
|
|
|
- Identify potential barriers and facilitators to success,
including lessons learned from year 2000 activities
See
SWOT Worksheet
|
|
|
|
|
- Present state plan development process to political leaders
(executive and legislative) and leadership of other agencies for support
See
Sample State Statutes
|
|
|
|
|
- Identify related initiatives to integrate or consider
coordination with state plan
|
|
|
|
|
- Engage partners early in process and maintain involvement
as appropriate
See
Potential Partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Identify and
Secure Resources |
- Identify staff, financial, and technical resources needed
to develop state plan
|
|
|
|
|
- Develop budget to plan, publish, market, and (if desired)
support implementation of state plan
See
Sample Budget Line Items
|
|
|
|
|
- Plan to integrate the plan into state planning, budgeting,
and programming processes
|
|
|
|
|
- Identify existing resources (e.g., block grants) that could
be used to support proposed tasks
See
Finding Other Resources
|
|
|
|
|
- Develop staff and technical support plan
|
|
|
|
|
- Identify potential external funding sources and
organizations or businesses that can offer printing, supplies, other donated services,
and/or dollars
See
Finding Other Resources
|
|
|
|
|
- Secure identified resources, (including staff expertise in
other agencies, organizations, foundations, etc.) and develop alternative resources, if
necessary (See resource listings in Appendix
A.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Identify and
Engage Community Partners |
|
See
How to Develop a Marketing Plan
|
|
|
|
|
- Identify key individuals and organizations that can provide
connections to the community or specific expertise
See
Potential Partners
|
|
|
|
|
- Design strategies for engaging all partners in
development and implementation processes
|
|
|
|
|
- Identify roles for partners and assign responsibilities
|
|
|
|
|
- Establish formal partnership agreements where appropriate
to sustain activities and involve partners
See
Forming Partnership Agreements
See
Consortium Pledge
|
|
|
|
|
- Develop accountability and evaluation plans, including
identification of specific persons or groups of people responsible for each action item
with target dates
|
|
|
|
|
- Develop a communication vehicle to highlight partner
activities as they relate to the state plan
|
|
|
|
|
- Reassess and evaluate partner involvement and satisfaction
in plan development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Set Health
Priorities and Establish Objectives |
- Evaluate input received from community partners and expert
advisors
See
Worksheet 1
See
Simple "Market Research" Strategies
|
|
|
|
|
- Collect and review information from previous
community/state health needs and assets assessments and determine if new ones are needed
|
|
|
|
|
- Conduct assessments of health needs and assets, if
necessary
See
Defining Assets
|
|
|
|
|
- Examine and plan for transitions from year 2000 to year
2010 health objectives (e.g., updates, integration, progress reviews)
|
|
|
|
|
- From previous activity, decide where changes from year 2000
plans need to be made and what should be retained. Identify specific health priorities,
contributing factors, and other issues that have emerged and should be addressed.
|
|
|
|
|
- Define the scope of the state plan, (e.g., racial
disparities, public health infrastructure, mental health, environmental health, substance
abuse, and behavioral factors)
|
|
|
|
|
- Set criteria for establishing potential priority areas or
focus areas
See
Priority Setting Worksheet
See
Priority Setting in Maryland
See
Leading Health Indicators
|
|
|
|
|
- Establish a process for final determination of priorities
|
|
|
|
|
- Identify and obtain information to evaluate areas according
to criteria
|
|
|
|
|
- Select final priority or focus areas
|
|
|
|
|
- Determine types of objectives desired [e.g., measurable vs.
in need of data (developmental), qualitative vs. quantitative, process vs. outcome] for
each area and establish criteria for adopting them
See
Criteria for Objectives Development
|
|
|
|
|
- Outline standard information to include with all priority
areas and objectives, (e.g., trend data, targets, accountable or committed partners,
policy and regulation issues, populations to target, standards or guidelines, intervention
strategies, exemplary programs)
See
Developing Priority Areas
|
|
|
|
|
- Specify intervention points; identify potential topics and
indicators for objectives (what you want to measure, such as health status, behaviors, or
interventions)
See
Potential Health Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
Defining the Terms
See
Worksheet 2: Writing Objectives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Obtain
Baseline Measures, Set Targets, and Measure Progress |
- Consult with state vital statistics division, or other
appropriate agencies to provide information on census changes, data changes/requirements
for age adjustment, ICD-10, and other data changes
See
Explaining Data Changes
|
|
|
|
|
- Set criteria for evaluating the quality and appropriateness
of existing public and private data sources
See
Evaluating Data
|
|
|
|
|
- Inventory relevant public and private data sources to
support measurement of objectives
See
Potential Health Measures
See
Existing Data Systems
|
|
|
|
|
- Review progress and successes in achieving state Healthy
People 2000 objectives
See
Measuring Progress
|
|
|
|
|
- Develop targets with appropriate baselines and measures
(i.e., determine the desired amount of change for each objective), and finalize objectives
See
Setting Targets for Objectives
|
|
|
|
|
- Develop methods for measuring objectives without existing
data sources (e.g., new data sources, estimation techniques, attainable proxies)
|
|
|
|
|
- Gather and evaluate other data and information to include
in state plan
|
|
|
|
|
- Plan regular intervals to measure and track achievement of
targets via identified data sources (e.g., annual progress reviews)
See
Measuring Progress
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Manage and
Sustain the Process |
- Designate staff and organizational unit for coordinating
state plan development
|
|
|
|
|
- Create a work plan and time line to develop and release the
plan
See
Planning and Development Checklist
See
Sample Time Line —Overview
|
|
|
|
|
- Coordinate expertise and staff support to carry out
identified tasks in work plan
See
Participant Roles & Responsibilities
|
|
|
|
|
- Assign development tasks to teams or individuals
|
|
|
|
|
- Establish and implement meaningful, ongoing processes for
input from key staff, partners, stake-holders, and communities
See
How Do You Define Meaningful Citizen Participation?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Plan reviews to update baselines and targets, add
objectives to meet emerging issues, and report on progress
|
|
|
|
|
- Plan to integrate state plan into ongoing planning,
budgeting, programming, and legislative processes
|
|
|
|
|
- Develop a ten-year plan and time line to release,
implement, and monitor the plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Communicate
Health Goals and Objectives |
- Establish marketing and communication goals and objectives
See
How to Develop a Marketing Plan
|
|
|
|
|
- Conduct target audience research
See
Simple "Market Research" Strategies
|
|
|
|
|
- Develop a publication and dissemination plan
|
|
|
|
|
- Design state-specific Healthy People identity (e.g., logo,
color scheme, web site, spokesperson)
|
|
|
|
|
- Develop and implement marketing and communication plan
(e.g., strategies for using the media and other available resources to engage the
community and influence actions or beliefs)
See
How to Develop a Marketing Plan
|
|
|
|
|
- Prepare state plan for publication and dissemination
|
|
|
|
|
- Develop supporting companion documents that target specific
audiences, focus areas, or strategies
|
|
|
|
|
- Manage document review process
|
|
|
|
|
- Publish and release state plan
|
|
|
|
|
- Collect and disseminate to community partners exemplary
practices from local plans throughout state
|
|
|
|
|
- Continue to promote interest in meeting targets and health
improvement (e.g., web sites, press releases, newsletters, TV spots, speeches, etc.)
|
|
|
|
|
- Periodically report progress to partners, policy makers,
and community partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
Evaluate Your Marketing Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sample Time
LineOverview
| |
Percent Time Elapsed (tailor to your project period) |
ACTION
AREA |
|
|
25% |
|
|
50% |
|
|
75% |
|
|
100% |
| Build the
Foundation: Leadership and Structure
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Identify and Secure
Resources
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Identify and Engage
Community Partners
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
| Set Health
Priorities and Establish Objectives
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
| Obtain Baseline
Measures, Set Targets, and Measure Progress
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
| Manage and Sustain
the Process
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
| Communicate Health
Goals and Objectives
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Sample Time
LineDetailed View
| |
Percent Time Elapsed (tailor to your project period) |
ACTION
AREA |
|
|
25% |
|
|
50% |
|
|
75% |
|
|
100% |
Build
the Foundation: Leadership and Structure |
| Secure senior staff
commitment to develop state plan |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Meet internally and
form preparation team to identify goals and guide early stages of development |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Create a structure
for the planning process |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Examine
policy/political environment |
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Identify potential
barriers to success, including lessons learned from 2000 |
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Determine
composition and function of advisory/steering groups |
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Present process to
leaders and agency colleagues for support |
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Identify initiatives
to integrate with state plan |
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identify
and Secure Resources |
| Identify staff,
financial, and technical resources needed to develop the state plan |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Develop budget to
plan, publish, market, and (if desired) support implementation of state plan |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Develop staff and
technical support plan |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identify
potential funding sources aligned with goals of planning and implementation |
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Secure or develop
alternative resources |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identify
and Engage Community Partners |
| Define target
audiences |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Identify key
individuals and organizations |
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Design strategies to
engage partners |
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Establish
partnerships and clarify roles |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
| Develop a plan to
evaluate partner involvement |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Set
Health Priorities and Establish Objectives |
| Evaluate input from
partners |
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
| Review available
needs assessments and data sources. Conduct needs and assets assessment, if needed |
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Examine and plan for
transitions from year 2000 to year 2010 objectives |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Describe scope of
state plan |
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Set criteria for
determining priority or focus areas |
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Identify and obtain
information to evaluate areas according to criteria |
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Determine types of
objectives desired for each area and objectives for adopting them |
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
| Outline standard
information to include with all priority areas and objectives, such as trend data,
strategies, and model programs |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
| Select priority or
focal areas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
| Develop draft
objectives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
| Draft final text for
each priority area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
Obtain
Baseline Measures, Set Targets, and Measure Progress |
| Partner with vital
statistics or others for technical assistance on data issues |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
| Set criteria to
evaluate public and private data sources |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
| Inventory public and
private data sources to support measurement of objectives |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
| Review progress in
achieving state Healthy People 2000 objectives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
| Develop final
objectives with appropriate baselines, targets, and measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
| Develop methods to
measure objectives without existing data sources, as needed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
| Gather and evaluate
other information to include with objectives in state plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
Manage
and Sustain the Process |
| Designate staff and
organizational unit to coordinate state plan activities |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Create a work plan
for planning process, release, and monitoring of plan |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Assign development
tasks to teams or individuals |
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
| Establish and
implement processes for input from key staff, partners, and community members |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
| Market the
development process |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
| | |