Skip navigation
Link to HHS Web Site
Healthy People 2020 logo

Healthy People Home > Healthy People 2020 > Secretary's Advisory Committee > Third Meeting > Minutes > Appendix 7

Healthy People 2020 logo Third Meeting: June 5 and 6, 2008

Appendix 7

Physical and Social Environment
Draft Definitions and Key Concepts

Proposed Modification of Healthy People 2010 Definitions of Social and Physical Environments


Social environment includes interactions with family, friends, coworkers, and others in the community, as well as societal attitudes, norms, and expectations. It encompasses social relationships and policies within such settings as schools, neighborhoods, workplaces, businesses, places of worship, health care settings, recreation facilities, and other public places. It includes social modeling of healthful behaviors (e.g., tobacco use, substance abuse, physical activity) in the community. It also encompasses social institutions, such as law enforcement and governmental as well as non-governmental organizations. At the community level, the social environment can reflect culture, language, political and religious beliefs, social norms and attitudes (e.g., discriminatory or stigmatizing attitudes), as well as socioeconomic conditions (e.g., poverty), exposure to crime and violence, social cohesion, and social disorder through indicators such as trash and graffiti. Mass media and emerging communication and information technologies such as the worldwide web and cellular telephone technology are a ubiquitous component of the social environment that can affect health and wellbeing. The social environment also includes availability of resources, based on socioeconomic conditions, to meet basic daily needs, including adequate incomes, health insurance, personal assistance services, and healthful foods. At a societal level, policies made in governmental, corporate, and non-governmental sectors can impact health and health behaviors in whole populations both positively and negatively. At the same time, individuals, their behaviors, and their ability to interact with the larger community contribute to the quality of the social environment, as do the resources available in neighborhoods and the community.

Physical environment can be thought of as including the natural environment, which refers to plants, the atmosphere, weather, and topography, and the built environment, which refers to buildings, spaces, transportation systems, and products that are created, or modified, by people. Physical environments can consist of particular individual or institutional settings (e.g., homes, worksites, schools, health care settings, recreational settings) as well as surrounding neighborhoods and related community areas where individuals live, work, travel, play, and conduct their other daily activities. The physical environment can harm individual and community health, especially when individuals and communities are exposed to toxic substances, irritants, infectious agents, stress-producing factors (e.g., noise), and physical hazards in homes, schools, worksites, and other settings and as part of transportation systems. Physical barriers within these environments can present tangible safety hazards or impediments to persons with disabling conditions. The physical environment also can promote good health and wellbeing, for example, through exposure to nature or favorable aesthetic attributes of neighborhoods, or by providing community settings and environments that facilitate healthful behavioral choices in such areas as diet, physical activity, alcohol use, and tobacco use.

The interactions between individuals and their environments, both physical and social, can impact a wide range of health, functioning, and quality of life outcomes.

Environment and Determinants Subcommittee
Proposed Overarching Principles and Recommended Activities
Relevant to Healthy People 2020

Recommended Overarching Principles:

  1. The Multi-level nature of health determinants and interventions should be an organizing principle for Healthy People 2020
    • Health and health behaviors are determined by influences at multiple levels, including personal (biological, psychological), organizational/institutional, social and physical environmental, and policy levels. Given that significant and dynamic inter-relationships exist among these different levels of health determinants, interventions are most likely to be effective when they address determinants at all levels.
      • Extensive experience indicates that intervention at one or two levels is usually insufficient to produce widespread and long-lasting change. For example, motivating people to change health-related behaviors when social and physical environments are unsupportive often leads to weak, temporary change. Similarly, creating favorable physical environments does not ensure people will take advantage of opportunities; motivation and instruction also are needed. The tobacco control experience indicates that multi-level interventions, including strong environmental and policy components, can be effective in creating long-term population-wide improvements in health behavior and health outcomes. Healthy People 2020 should identify the most promising intervention strategies at each level and across levels, and encourage implementation of multi-level interventions for each health area, whenever possible.
    • Given the historical focus of many health fields on individual-level health determinants and interventions, a particular emphasis on health-enhancing social and physical environments should be reflected in Healthy People 2020. Changes in social environments, physical environments, and policies are expected to affect entire populations over extended periods of time and to make it easier for people to respond to individual-level interventions.
  2. Necessity of building multidisciplinary and inter-sectoral partnerships
    • Multi-disciplinary and inter-sectoral partnerships are needed to maximize population and individual health, by addressing the web of multi-level factors pertinent to health (e.g., public health, health care financing, social services, cultural organizations, schools, employers, health care organizations, municipal planners, transportation departments, food industry manufacturers and suppliers, builders, media companies, etc.).
    • The process of building dynamic and productive partnerships and collaborations and harnessing these partnerships to develop and deliver relevant interventions is key to their success. The partners ultimately decide which programs and policies are implemented, and which objectives are put into practice and maintained. It is likely that such inter-sectoral partnerships will need to occur at the highest levels of government in order to enact the types of multi-level interventions necessary to significantly impact the health of the nation.
  3. Promoting environmental justice
    • An important goal of harnessing social and physical environmental factors is to increase health equity and decrease health-related inequalities. Doing so involves recognition of the substantial impacts of socioeconomic status and related factors on health, functioning, and well being from birth throughout the life course. These impacts occur across all determinants levels (individual, social and physical environmental, societal). Reducing social environment inequalities, like crime, and physical environment inequalities, like access to healthful foods and parks, can help to improve key health behaviors and other determinants and, consequently, meet numerous health objectives.
    • The responsibilities for promoting healthful individual-level, social, physical, and policy environments go beyond traditional public health sectors, thus other public and private sectors need to be engaged to promote environmental justice.
    • Promoting health-enhancing policies and programs across multiple sectors of society (private and public institutions and entities) will likely benefit from implementation of economic incentives (aimed at organizations and institutions as well as individuals) for healthier behaviors and environments.
  4. Encouraging a focus on higher-level "upstream" interventions whenever possible
    • Identify 'passive prevention' strategies that can impact broad segments of the population with minimal individual-level decision-making (e.g., tobacco control measures such as non-smoking policies in public buildings; creating vehicle-free zones in downtown areas or town centers; offering competitively priced healthful choices in food vending machines; including fluoride in toothpaste).
  5. Highlighting emerging social and physical environments that deserve increased attention
    • The societal changes emerging from the rapid uptake of computer-based communication environments and similar technological advances deserve further study and focus vis-à-vis their current and potential impacts on the Nation’s health. There is the potential for positive and negative health effects of technology, and the positive effects have not been adequately realized; e.g., social networking for health, improved health information at point of decision, "exer-gaming", etc.

Content for this site is maintained by the Office of Disease Prevention & Health Promotion, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Last revised: September 23, 2008