Midcourse Review  >  Table of Contents  > Focus Area 28: Vision and Hearing  >  Disparities Table

Figure 28-2. Disparities Table for Focus Area 28: Vision and Hearing
Disparities from the best group rate for each characteristic at the most recent data point and changes in disparity from the baseline to the most recent data point.



Characteristics: Gender and Education
Population-based objectives Female Male Less than high school High school graduate At least some college Summary index
28-1. Dilated eye examinations at appropriate
intervals: 18+ years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
The group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rate10-49 percent difference from the best group rate10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rate
28-2. Vision screening: < 6 years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
28-3. Uncorrected visual impairment due to refractive errors (1999-2000)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
28-4. Blindness and visual impairment:
< 18 years (1997, 2003)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
28-5. Visual impairment due to diabetic
retinopathy: 18+ years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.
28-6. Visual impairment due to glaucoma:
45+ years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.
28-7. Visual impairment due to cataracts:
65+ years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant10-49 percent difference from the best group rate
28-8b. Occupational eye injuries treated in emergency departments: full-time workers (1999)Measures of variability were not available. Thus, the variability of best group rates was not assessed, and the statistical significance of disparities and changes in disparity over time could not be tested. See Technical Appendix. The group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 100 percent or more percent difference from the best group rateData not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.
28-9a. Protective eyewear use: 6-17 years
(2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
28-9b. Protective eyewear use: 18+ years
(2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant
28-10a. Vision rehabilitation services use:
18+ years (2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Data not available.Data not available.The group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantData not available.
28-10b. Visual adaptive devices use: 18+ years
(2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantLess than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant
28-12. Otitis media: < 18 years
(1997, 2002)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
The group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significantCharacteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
28-13a. Hearing aid use: 20-69 years
(2001)Measures of variability were not available. Thus, the variability of best group rates was not assessed, and the statistical significance of disparities and changes in disparity over time could not be tested. See Technical Appendix.
The group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Less than 10 percent difference from the best group rate or not statistically significant10-49 percent difference from the best group rate
28-13b. New cochlear implants
(2001)Measures of variability were not available. Thus, the variability of best group rates was not assessed, and the statistical significance of disparities and changes in disparity over time could not be tested. See Technical Appendix.
The group with the best rate for specified characteristic. 50-99 percent difference from the best group rateData not available.Data not available.Data not available.Data not available.
28-14a. Hearing examination in past 5 years:
20-69 years (1999-2000, 2001-02)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
28-14b. Hearing examination in past 5 years:
70+ years (1999-2000, 2001-02)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
10-49 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
28-16a. Hearing protective device use: noise-
exposed persons 20-69 years (1999-2000)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
50-99 percent difference from the best group rateThe group with the best rate for specified characteristic. Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
28-17. Noise-induced hearing loss: 12-19 years
(1988-94)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.
28-18. Noise-induced hearing loss: 20-69 years
(1999-2000)The variability of best group rates was assessed, and disparities of ≥10% are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Changes in disparity over time, noted with arrows, are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. See Technical Appendix.
Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Best group rate reliability criterion not met.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.Characteristic not selected for this objective.

Notes:

Data for objectives 28-8a, 28-11a, b, and c, 28-13c and d, 28-14c, and 28-16b are unavailable or not applicable. Objective 28-15 was deleted at the midcourse.

Years in parentheses represent the baseline data year and the most recent data year (if available).

Disparity from the best group rate is defined as the percent difference between the best group rate and each of the other group rates for a characteristic (for example, race and ethnicity). The summary index is the average of these percent differences for a characteristic. Change in disparity is estimated by subtracting the disparity at baseline from the disparity at the most recent data point. Change in the summary index is estimated by subtracting the summary index at baseline from the summary index at the most recent data point. See Technical Appendix for more information.







<<  Previous—Disparities Table: Race and Ethnicity   |   Table of Contents   |   Next—Disparities Table: Income and Disability  >>


[ Top ]